Double-Edged Sword of Strategic Agility: Capability Drivers of Sustainable Competitive Advantage in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jbmed.v4i02.2399Keywords:
Private Higher Education Institutions, Research Capacity, Marketing Capability, Strategic Agility, Sustainable Competitive AdvantageAbstract
The growing demand for quality higher education in developing countries has placed private higher education institutions (PHEIs) under increasing pressure to build and sustain competitive advantage. Yet, how internal strategic capabilities collectively shape long-term competitiveness in these institutions remains insufficiently explored. This study investigates the influence of research capacity and marketing capability on sustainable competitive advantage among PHEIs in Indonesia, with strategic agility serving as a mediating variable. A quantitative explanatory design was adopted, drawing on survey data from 318 institutional leaders and analyzed through PLS-SEM. The findings reveal that both research capacity (β = 0.509, p < 0.001) and marketing capability (β = 0.455, p < 0.001) exert positive and significant direct effects on sustainable competitive advantage. However, strategic agility exhibits a significant negative direct effect (β = –0.367, p < 0.001), suggesting that excessive short-term responsiveness may undermine institutional stability. The mediation analysis indicates that strategic agility positively mediates the relationship between research capacity and competitive advantage, but negatively mediates the marketing capability–competitive advantage path. These findings contribute to the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities literature by demonstrating the nuanced role of strategic agility in higher education settings, offering practical guidance for PHEI leaders seeking to balance adaptability with long-term institutional coherence. The study extends the marketing capability literature by showing where market sensing strength becomes self-defeating, and offers PHEI leaders a clearer rule: deploy marketing capability for direct positioning, but moderate the speed and frequency of the strategic shifts it triggers.
Downloads
References
Alkandi, I., & Helmi, M. (2024). The impact of strategic agility on organizational performance: the mediating role of market orientation and innovation capabilities in emerging industrial sector. Cogent Business & Management, 11, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2396528
Amaya, N., Bernal-Torres, C. A., Nicolás-Rojas, Y. W., & Pando-Ezcurra, T. T. (2022). Role of internal resources on the competitive advantage building in a knowledge-intensive organisation in an emerging market. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 54. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2022-0029
Ardianto, Y., & Baharuddin, G. (2025). Investigating Competitive Advantage Determinants among Private Universities Towards Excellent Accreditation. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, 08. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v8-i5-12
Arokodare, M. A., Asikhia, O., & Makinde, O. G. (2019). Strategic Agility and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Organisational Culture. Business Management Dynamics, 09(03).
Aslamiyah, S. (2026). Private Higher Education Quality Development Strategy in Improving Competitiveness. SENTRALISASI, 15, 396-428. https://doi.org/10.33506/sl.v15i1.5227
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage (Vol. 17). Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
Boccardelli, P., Bartoli, C., & Gerardi, L. (2025). Navigating paradox through strategic agility: A case study from the mobility sector. Journal of Management & Organization, 32, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2025.10042
BPS. (2026). Jumlah Perguruan Tinggi1, Dosen, dan Mahasiswa2 (Negeri dan Swasta) di Bawah Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi, Sains, dan Teknologi Menurut Provinsi, 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/id/statistics-
Clauss, T., Abebe, M. A., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2019). Strategic Agility, Business Model Innovation, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68, 767-784.
Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2020.07.003
Comai, A. (2025). The power of digital marketing capabilities: The case of higher education. Journal of Marketing Communications, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2025.2486131
de Diego, E., & Almodóvar, P. (2022). Mapping research trends on strategic agility over the past 25 years: insights from a bibliometric approach. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 31(2), 219-238. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-05-2021-0160
Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding Strategic Agility: A Leadership Agenda for Accelerating Business Model Renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 370-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: a capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7
Eisenhardt, K. M., Furr, N. R., & Bingham, C. B. (2010). Microfoundations of Performance: Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility in Dynamic Environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
Elgarhy, S. D., & Abou-Shouk, M. (2023). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation, marketing, and innovation capabilities, on market performance: The mediating effect of sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(6), 1986-2004. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2022-0508
Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Frazier, M., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12213
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., Fayolle, A., Klofsten, M., & Mian, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities: emerging models in the new social and economic landscape. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9755-4
Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool for Business Research. European Business Review, 26, 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. (2016). Using PLS Path Modeling in New Technology Research: Updated Guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
Karoney, F., Awino, Z., Aosa, E., & Gituro, W. (2024). Strategic Agility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: How to Leverage Top Management Team Characteristics. European Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 9, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.47604/ejbsm.3040
Lee, S., & Yoo, J. (2021). Determinants of a Firm’s Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Focused on Korean Small Enterprises. Sustainability, 13(1), 346. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/346
Likert, R. (2022). Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
Mwita, K., & Mrema, G. (2023). The Influence of Transformational and Transactional Leadership on Organisational Performance: A Case of a Higher Education Institution in Tanzania. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(5). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v2i5.477
Nadaf, Z. A., & Siddiqui, M. H. (2019). Achieving Excellence in Higher Education. Review of Education, 7, 63-80.
Nguyen, B., Yu, X., Melewar, T. C., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2016). Brand Ambidexterity and Commitment in Higher Education: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Business Research, 69, 3105-3112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.01.026
OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. O. Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en.html
Öztırak, M. (2023). The Moderator Role of Organizational Learning in the Relationship Between Agile Leadership and Organizational Agility. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.08.2171
Pacheco, A., Ferreira, J. J. M., Simões, J., Veiga, P., & Caputo, A. (2024). University entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial orientation, networks, market orientation, and sustainable development. Management Decision, 62(13), 456-481. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-09-2023-1611
Padilla-Meléndez, A., Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., Lockett, N., & Fuster, E. (2020). Entrepreneurial Universities and Sustainable Development. The Network Bricolage Process of Academic Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 12(4), 1403. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1403
PDDikti. (2025). Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi. In P. D. P. Tinggi (Ed.). Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi Sekretariat Jenderal.
Pham, L. T., & Hoang, H. V. (2019). The relationship between organizational learning capability and business performance. Journal of Economics and Development, 21(2), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-10-2019-0041
Polas, M. R. H. (2025). Common Method Bias in Social and Behavioral Research: Strategic Solutions for Quantitative Research in the Doctoral Research. Journal of Comprehensive Business Administration Research. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJCBAR52024285
Pratiwi, M., & Kusumah, L. (2024). Enhancing the accreditation of Indonesian private universities through the integration of EduQual and accreditation standards of the BAN-PT. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 10, 227-243. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i2.76406
Preacher, K. (2008). Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior research methods, 40, 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Roman, A. G. (2021). Research Competencies and Performance of Higher Education Institutions (HEI) Faculty. International Journal of Research Publications, 78, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP100781620211975
Salmi, J. (2017). The Tertiary Education Imperative: Knowledge, Skills and Values for Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6351-128-5
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Hair, J. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In (pp. 1-47). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
Schoemaker, P., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Leadership. California Management Review, 61, 000812561879024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618790246
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. In (Seventh ed.): John Wiley & Sons.
Shams, R., Vrontis, D., Chaudhuri, R., Chavan, G., & Czinkota, M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement for innovation management and entrepreneurial development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.036
Sharafuddin, M. A., & Janarthanam, S. (2025). Why Method Matters: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Marketing Capability–Performance Relationship. Encyclopedia, 5(4), 212. https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8392/5/4/212
Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2019). How service quality affects university brand performance, university brand image and behavioural intention: the mediating effects of satisfaction and trust and moderating roles of gender and study mode. Journal of Brand Management, 26(3), 332-347. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0131-3
Tarba, S., Frynas, G., Liu, Y., Wood, G., Sarala, R., & Fainshmidt, S. (2023). Strategic agility in international business. Journal of World Business, 58, 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101411
Teece, D. J. (2018). Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(3), 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7
Teece, D. J., Raspin, P. G., & Cox, D. R. (2020). Plotting strategy in a dynamic world. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(1), 28-33.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publication. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/reimagining-our-futures-together-new-social-contract-education
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report, 2023: technology in education: a tool on whose terms? The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Vorhies, D., & Morgan, N. (2005). Benchmarking Marketing Capabilities for Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Marketing Journal of Marketing, 69, 80-94. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.1.80.55505
Wang, X.-W., Zhang, Y.-C., & Du, Q. (2024). Research into the impact of an imbalanced teaching-academic research evaluation system on the quality of higher education: based on the mediation effect of the sense of belonging to a university. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1348452
Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning.
Wu, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Development Strategies for Higher Education Institutions Based on the Cultivation of Core Competitiveness. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16, 163. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i21.26873
Yaakub, M. H., & Mohamed, Z. A. (2020). Measuring the performance of private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(3), 425-443. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-10-2018-0208
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ema Trisnawati, Barkah, Wenny Pebrianti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














