Argumentative Text as a Reflection of Non-Language Students' Critical Thinking Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v4i02.2386Keywords:
argumentative text, critical thinking, writing skillsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the critical thinking skills of non-language students in writing argumentative texts. This study uses mixed method with explanatory sequential design. The subjects of this study were non-language students who participated in argumentative text writing lessons. The research data were obtained through argumentative text writing assignments which were then analyzed based on critical thinking ability indicators. The results showed that the critical thinking ability of non-language students in writing argumentative texts was in the high category with an average score of 69,88. In general, students were able to convey claims clearly, provide relevant reasons, and present supporting data or evidence to support their arguments. Students also demonstrated the ability to connect arguments logically and draw conclusions that were in accordance with the discussion. However, some students still experienced difficulties in developing stronger evidence and considering other points of view more deeply. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that argumentative texts can be an effective medium for measuring and developing students' critical thinking skills. Therefore, learning to write argumentative texts needs to be continuously developed with strategies that encourage students to express arguments logically, supported by relevant data, and consider various points of view on a problem. This study contributes to the field of language and literacy education by demonstrating that critical thinking skills can be systematically identified through the analysis of argumentative texts produced by students from non-language disciplines. Unlike previous studies that predominantly focus on language learners, this research provides empirical insights into how argumentative writing reflects critical thinking processes among non-language students, thereby expanding the scope of critical thinking assessment in higher education.
Downloads
References
Adawiyah, R., & Mahmuddin, M. (2023). Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning in Improving Critical Thinking Skills and Environmental Concern Attitude in Vocational Students. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 2(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v2i01.390
Afrin, T., & Litman, D. (2023). Predicting Desirable Revisions of Evidence and Reasoning in Argumentative Writing. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 2023, 2550–2561. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.193
Akib, E., Muhsin, M. A., Hamid, S. M., & Irawan, N. (2024). Critical Thinking in Authentic Assessment: An Exploration into Argumentative Writing Non-English Department in Higher Education. International Journal of Language Education, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v8i4.70051
Andreucci-Annunziata, P., Riedemann, A., Cortés, S., Mellado, A., del Río, M. T., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2023). Conceptualizations and Instructional Strategies on Critical Thinking in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1141686. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1141686
Andriessen, J. (2014). Argumentation in Higher Education: Examples of Actual Practices with Argumentation Tools. Springer.
Backman, Y., Reznitskaya, A., Gardelli, V., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2023). Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing. Written Communication, 40(2), 555–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221148664
Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Beniche, M. (2023). The Correlation Between Critical Thinking Skills and Argumentative Writing Skills in Moroccan Higher Education. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i1.1226
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52.
Ennis, R. H. (2011). Critical thinking: Reflection and perspective. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4–18.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
Ghunu, L. (2023). Keterampilan Menulis Argumentasi dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Deepublish.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.
Halum, Y. S., & Guna, S. (2021). The Manifestation of Critical Thinking Elements in EFL Students’ Argumentative Writing. TELL-US Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2021.v7i2.4913
Harahap, R. (2022). Keterampilan Menulis dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Rajawali Pers.
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70.
Keraf, G. (2007). Argumentasi dan Narasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44(1), 46–53.
Lai, E. R. (2011). Critical Thinking: A Literature Review.
Latief, J. A., Haliadi, H., Muchlis, A. A., & Afni, N. (2024). Information Literacy: Utilization of Taman Budaya and Museum UPT Towards Motivation for Learning History. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 2(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v2i02.824
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The academic literacies model: Theory and applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 368–377.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2014). Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Professional and Personal Life (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Pohan, E., Emilia, E., & Damayanti, I. L. (2025). Using Task-Based Learning to Teach Argumentative Writing and Foster Critical Thinking in Higher Education. English Review: Journal of English Education, 13(2), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v13i2.11839
Rapanta, C., & Felton, M. K. (2022). Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: A Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 477–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09637-2
Siegel, H. (2021). Educating Reason: Rationality, Critical Thinking, and Education. Routledge.
Toulmin, S. (2003). The Uses of Argument (Updated). Cambridge University Press.
Utomo, B. (2023). Implementation of Problem-Based Learning to Develop Students Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 1(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v1i01.12
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 31(2), 8–19.
Zhao, H., Dang, T. N. Y., & Finlayson, N. (2025). Operationalising Critical Thinking in Postgraduate Disciplinary Writing: Insights from Corpus and Cluster Analyses of Lecturer Feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(3), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2406869
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rahayu Fitri, Upit Yulianti DN

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














