Criminal Sanctions for Corruption in Islamic and Positive Legal Systems: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v4i01.2167Keywords:
Criminal Sanctions, Corruption, Islamic Law, Positive LawAbstract
Corruption constitutes a serious criminal offense that undermines legal integrity, social justice, and the sustainability of national development. Beyond its characterization as a violation of positive law, corruption also represents a profound breach of moral values and public trust (amanah) within the framework of Islamic law. This article aims to comparatively analyze criminal sanctions for corruption under Islamic law and positive law, with particular focus on Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt. The study adopts a normative juridical methodology employing a comparative law approach, examining statutory regulations, doctrines of Islamic criminal law (fiqh jināyah), and relevant contemporary legal literature. The findings demonstrate that, within Islamic law, corruption is classified as a jarīmah ta‘zīr, as its sanctions are not explicitly stipulated in the primary sources (naṣṣ). Consequently, discretionary authority is vested in rulers or judges to determine appropriate penalties based on considerations of public welfare and social harm. In contrast, Indonesia regulates corruption through comprehensive and specialized anti-corruption legislation, emphasizing imprisonment, fines, and supplementary sanctions such as asset confiscation and the revocation of certain rights. Saudi Arabia implements a criminal law framework grounded predominantly in Islamic law and reinforced by modern regulatory instruments, imposing relatively severe sanctions designed to ensure deterrence and safeguard public trust. Meanwhile, Egypt applies a civil law–based legal system, criminalizing corruption through codified provisions in the Penal Code and specialized anti-corruption statutes. This study concludes that, notwithstanding conceptual and structural differences in the regulation of corruption sanctions, both Islamic law and positive law converge on shared objectives, namely the preservation of justice, the prevention of social harm, and the protection of public interests. The integration of ethical values and the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah into positive legal systems offers significant potential to enhance the coherence, legitimacy, and long-term effectiveness of anti-corruption frameworks.
Downloads
References
Abdalsalam, T. S. (2023). Evaluating the disciplinary system of public servants in Egypt: A comparative study. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 7(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20230701.14
Afrizal, T. Y. (2024). The Criminal Acts of Corruption as Extraordinary Crimes in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 1(1), 27-37. https://journal.lps2h.com/ijlsh/article/view/141
Al Munawar, F. A. (2021). ‘Abd al-Majīd al-Najjār’s Perspective on Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 20(2), 209-223. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v20i2.4281
Al Munawar, F. A. (2025). The legal sanctions of corruption criminal acts in Indonesia from the perspective of Abdul Majid An-Najjar's Islamic legal philosophy. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization (JMISC), 3(1), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i01.1416
Alatawi, O. D. (2025). Combating corruption and promoting economic resilience: legal and institutional reform in Saudi Arabia. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 1597. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05873-x
AlGhamdi, N. bin S. bin M. (2025). The regulatory framework for the protection of whistleblowers, witnesses, experts, and their equivalents in corruption cases: The Saudi system as a model. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.58256/s4gg7492
Alnafisah, L. A., & Alyahya, B. I. (2025). The Effects of Administrative Corruptionin Public Office in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Economic, Administrative and Legal Sciences, 9(9), 50 – 67. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.L1105252025
Aziz, M. W. (2017). SANKSI TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF FIQIH JINAYAT. International Journal Ihya’ ’Ulum Al-Din, 18(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.21580/ihya.17.2.1735
Beschel Jr., R. P., Schaider, I., & Chelbi, O. (2024). How effective are Arab anticorruption agencies? Is the glass half empty or half full? Middle East Council on Global Affairs. https://mecouncil.org/publication/how-effective-are-arab-anticorruption-agencies-is-the-glass-half-empty-or-half-full/
Bix, B. (2015). Jurisprudence: theory and context.
Chynoweth, P. (2008). Legal research. Advanced research methods in the built environment, 1.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Efendi, R. A., & Sukasih, A. (2024). Assessing the Effectiveness of Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System in Combatting Corruption: A Juridical Analysis. Law and Economics, 18(2), 110–121. https://journals.ristek.or.id/index.php/LE/article/view/85
El-Kady, R. (2024). Examining and Combating Corruption in Egyptian Criminal Legislation. In I. Yakubu (Ed.), Examining Corruption and the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 112-143). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2101-0.ch008
GAN Integrity. (2020). Egypt country risk report. GAN Integrity. https://www.ganintegrity.com/country-profiles/egypt/
Hidayat, R. T., Effendi, E., & Rahmadan, D. (2025). Corruption crimes in the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code vs. the Anti Corruption Laws: A comparative legal analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 13(4), 1566-1578. https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i4.8164
Hutchinson, T. (2013). Doctrinal research: researching the jury. In Research methods in law (pp. 15-41). Routledge.
Januaris, F. ., Arwani, M. K. ., Jumanda, A. ., Utama Yazid, I. ., Ulfazah, Y., & Fikri, R. . (2024). Combating Corruption in Indonesia Through Islamic Criminal Law and Customary Criminal Law. Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies, 2(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.57255/hakamain.v2i2.333
Kesiranon, K. (2023). Scrutinize the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC):A Human Rights Critique on Defining. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues, 3(2), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v3i2.27775
Lubis, T. I. M., & Ramadi, B. (2023). Theoretical Studies Regarding Corruption, Corruption Crimes, and Perspective Studies on Islamic Criminal Law Theory (Fiqh Jinayah). Al-Arfa: Journal of Sharia, Islamic Economics and Law, 1(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.61166/arfa.v1i2.38
Marlina, A. (2025). From Confiscation to Prevention: Asset Confiscation and the Impoverishment of Corruptors in Islamic Jurisprudence. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum, 14(2), 352-375. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v14i2.32508
McCrudden, C. (2017). Legal research and the social sciences. In Legal theory and the social sciences (pp. 149-167). Routledge.
Mostafa, M. I., & AlRomi, S. (2026, January 7). Anti bribery and anti corruption: Saudi Arabia. Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/indepth/anti-bribery-and-anti-corruption/saudi-arabia
Poerwanto, H., Setiyono, J., & Sunardi. (2023). Corruption as a Violation of Human Rights, Economic, Social and Cultural Human Rights Perspective. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 5(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.1.14
Puanandini, D. A., Maharani, V. S., & Anasela, P. (2024). Korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa: Analisis dampak dan upaya penegakan hukum. Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum, 3(3), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.59818/jps.v3i3.1173
Putri, N. T. A., Ratnasari, A., & Firananda, G. A. (2024). Restorative Justice and Anti-Corruption Law: Toward a Progressive Penal Policy in Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 13(2), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.14421/hnqvpv26
Ramadhani, M. A., Fadhilah, M. A., Ketaren, R. Z., Hutabarat, A. P., & Ahdy, Y. A. (2023). Penerapan hukum pidana Islam terhadap tindak pidana korupsi dalam tinjauan fiqih jinayah. Jurnal Sains Student Research, 3(5), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v3i5.5478
Rodriguez Olivari, D. (2024). Egypt: Corruption and anti corruption: A focus on non financial corruption risks (U4 Helpdesk Answer 2024:33). U4 Anti Corruption Resource Centre & Transparency International Knowledge Hub. https://knowledgehub.transparency.org/helpdesk/egypt corruption and anti corruption
Saudi Gazette. (2024, July 23). Oversight and Anti Corruption Authority granted expanded powers to combat corruption. Saudi Gazette. https://saudigazette.com.sa/article/644413
Setiawan, I. (2025). HUKUM PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM TAFSIR AL-JAMI’AL-AHKAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA AL-QURTUBI. Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an, 25(1), 47-61. https://journal.ptiq.ac.id/index.php/alburhan/article/view/612
Sumiadi, & Rasyid, Laila & Irwali, Ikramsyah. (2025). Corruption Crimes in Indonesia: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 2(1), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i1.224
Syarbaini, A. (2025). JARIMAH KORUPSI SEBAGAI KEJAHATAN LUAR BIASA. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v19i1.269
Thamsir, M., Latif, M., & Muhammad, P. (2025). Islamic Criminal Law Reform in Corruption Cases: Maqasid al-Shariah Perspective. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i1.10932
Van Hoecke, M. (Ed.). (2004). Epistemology and methodology of comparative law. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Wahid, S. (2021). Hukuman terhadap koruptor dalam perspektif hukum Islam: Punishment for corruptor in the perspective of Islamic law. Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam, 2(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v2i2.336
Wahyuni, F., Ishaq, I., & Irawan, A. (2021). Criminal Sanctions for Corruption Crimes Based on Perspective Study of Renewal Law and the Relationship with Islamic Criminal Law. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 21(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v21i2.795
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Faishal Agil Al Munawar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
