Digital Rights and Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia: Addressing Surveillance, Data Protection, and Cybercrime Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v4i01.2246Keywords:
digital rights, criminal law reform, Indonesia, cybercrime governance, data protectionAbstract
The rapid digitalization of contemporary societies has intensified tensions between criminal law enforcement and the protection of digital rights, particularly in emerging democracies. This study examines the structural challenges of safeguarding digital rights within Indonesia’s criminal law framework and identifies necessary reform pathways. Using a qualitative normative doctrinal approach structured as a single-country case study, the research analyses key statutory instruments, including the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the 2022 Personal Data Protection Law, alongside relevant legal doctrines and comparative regulatory models. The findings reveal five interrelated structural constraints: regulatory lag, tension between criminalization and fundamental rights, doctrinal rigidity, evidentiary and enforcement limitations, and institutional as well as digital literacy deficits. The study identifies a normative asymmetry in which speech-related criminal enforcement has evolved more assertively than privacy protection mechanisms. It argues that Indonesia represents a hybrid statutory model of digital governance, distinct from the European constitutionalized regulatory approach and the United States’ intermediary-immunity paradigm. Effective reform requires harmonized legislation, proportional criminalization, institutional modernization, and rights-oriented judicial interpretation. By reconceptualizing digital rights protection as a structural transformation of criminal law, this study expands digital governance theory beyond Euro-American binaries and highlights the distinctive regulatory pathways of Global South democracies.
Downloads
References
Ayu, H. (2025). Digital Vigilantism and Its Compatibility with Criminal Justice Principles in Indonesia. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 3(03). https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v3i03.637
Balkin, J. M. (2018). Free Speech in the Algorithmic Society. UC Davis Law Review.
Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001
Brownsword, R. (2019). Law, Technology and Society: Reimagining the Regulatory Environment. Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351128186
Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian law. Oxford University Press.
Calo, R. (2016). Robots and the Lessons of Cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3). https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/23
Celeste, E. (2019). Digital Constitutionalism: A New Systematic Theorisation. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2019.1562604
Citron, D. K. (2019). Cyber Civil Rights. Boston University Law Review.
Citron, D. K., & Wittes, B. (2017). The internet will not break: Denying bad Samaritans § 230 immunity. Fordham Law Review, 86(2), 401–423. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/faculty_scholarship/613
Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power: The legal constructions of informational capitalism. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190246693.001.0001
Douek, E. (2021). Governing Online Speech: From Posts-As-Trumps to Proportionality and Probability. Columbia Law Review, 121(3). ttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676799
Greenleaf, G. (2021). Global data privacy laws 2021: Despite COVID delays, 145 laws show GDPR dominance. Privacy Laws & Business International Report, 173, 10–13. https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLRS/2021/60.pdf
Hintz, A., Dencik, L., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2019). Digital Citizenship and Surveillance Society. International Journal of Communication, 13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3313099
Husovec, M. (2018). Injunctions Against Intermediaries in the European Union. JIPITEC, 9(2). https://www.isc.meiji.ac.jp/~ip/_src/sc1488/transcript20of20keynote2889p8cea81j.pdf
Kaye, D. (2019). Speech police: The global struggle to govern the internet. Columbia Global Reports.
Kettemann, M. C. & Tiedeke, A. S. (2020). Back up: can users sue platforms to reinstate deleted content?. Internet Policy Review, 9(2). DOI: 10.14763/2020.2.1484
Klonick, K. (2017). The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech. Harvard Law Review, 131(6). https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1598-1670_Online.pdf
Maulana Muhamad, R., Faizin, M., Agus Pranata, Y., & Afrizal, M. (2025). Meme Politik di Era Digital: Dilema Kebebasan Ekspresi dan Penegakan Hukum dalam Negara Demokratis Pancasila. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kewarganegara Indonesia, 2(2).
Napoli, P. M. (2019). Social Media and the Public Interest. Columbia Law Review, 119(7). https://doi.org/10.7312/napo18454
Nguyen, P. A. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence in criminal proceedings in Vietnam: Opportunities, challenges and orientation to improve the legal framework. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102273
Obe, E. T., Sinurat, A., & Fanggi, R. A. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Kejahatan Berbasis Teknologi Kecerdasan Buatan/Artificial Intelligence (AI). AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i2.1454
Sekar, A. Y., Setiono, J., & Sutrisno, S. (2025). Legal Vacuum Analysis and the Need for Criminal Policy Reformulation in Handling Cyberbullying Cases in Indonesia based on the Perspective of Child Protection and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions. Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i3.437
Susskind, R. (2019). Online courts and the future of justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 39(S1), i26–i48.
Suzor, N. (2019). Lawless: The secret rules that govern our digital lives. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108666428
Tambini, D. (2021). A theory of media freedom. Journal of Media Law, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1992128
Tri Cahyono, S., Erni, W., & Hidayat, T. (2025). RIKONSTRUKSI HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP KEJAHATAN SIBER (CYBER CRIME) DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA. Dame Journal of Law, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.64344/djl.v1i1.6
Union, I. T. (2023). Facts and figures 2023: Measuring digital development. https://www.itu.int
Waldron, J. (2018). Hate Speech and Harmful Expression. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amran, Muh. Tahir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
