Judicial Reasoning on Asset Forfeiture as the Satisfaction of Substitute Compensation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v4i02.2385Keywords:
Asset Recovery, Judicial Reasoning, Corruption, Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture, IndonesiaAbstract
The eradication of corruption in Indonesia faces a critical shift from retributive paradigms toward restorative justice and state financial recovery. This research examines Supreme Court Decision No. 4985 K/Pid.Sus/2022, which reflects an anomalous disparity between recovery ethos and procedural positivism. The study analyzes the ratio decidendi underlying the court’s rejection of seized physical assets as restitution and evaluates its strategic implications for the national asset forfeiture architecture. Employing a normative-doctrinal methodology, the analysis draws on Legal Purposivism and Integrative Jurisprudence. Findings reveal that the judiciary’s hyper-formalistic interpretation prioritized mathematical certainty over legal utility, paradoxically returning seized vehicles to the convict. This forced the Prosecution to resort to extra-procedural “bureaucratic gymnastics” to secure the assets, thereby exposing systemic inefficiencies. Macro-statistically, the current conviction-based regime yields a negligible recovery rate relative to the state's absolute losses of IDR 28.4 trillion in 2023. Significantly, this research contributes to criminal law jurisprudence by deconstructing the doctrinal impasse of the conventional in personam framework, providing a robust theoretical foundation for systemic legal reform. It concludes that transitioning to an in rem or Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture mechanism, as mandated by UNCAC Article 54, is an absolute imperative. Accelerating the Asset Forfeiture Bill will transcend rigid procedural dogmatism, ensuring efficient asset recovery and liberating the state from systemic institutional failures.
Downloads
References
Abdurrachman, H., Aryani, F. D., & Majestya, N. (2020). The Study of Judges’ Disparity in Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Agriculture, Social Sciences, Education, Technology and Health (ICASSETH 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200402.035
Adji, I. S. (2009). Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum. Diadit Media.
Agustine, O. V. (2019). RUU Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Hukum Pidana Dan Pembangunan Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.25105/hpph.v1i2.5546
Ali, A. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Kencana.
Ali, M., Setiawan, M. A., Sanjaya, W., & Muliyono, A. (2022). Is criminal fine in economic legislations effective? Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2068270
Ali, Z. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Andini, O. G., Nilasari, N., & Eurian, A. A. (2023). Restorative justice in Indonesia corruption crime: a utopia. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 31(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24247
Asy’ari, K. D., & Naibaho, N. (2024). Perampasan Aset dalam Upaya Pemulihan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(5), 1966–1973. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i5.2792
Atmasasmita, R. (2012). Teori Hukum Integratif: Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif. Genta Publishing.
Budianto, A. (2022). Legal Research Methodology Reposition in Research on Social Science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.154
Fitriyani, D., & Maizaroh, M. (2023). Possibility of Implementing In-Rem Asset Forfeiture as an Asset Recovery Effort in Indonesia. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism, 1(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2023.v1i2.62
Hock, B. (2026). Governing Money Laundering as a Collective-Action Problem: The European Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA). European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2026.10094
Huda, M. N., Mardhatillah, S. I., Ayunisa, Q., Munjiyah, A., & Nugroho, A. E. (2025). Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture: Presumption of Innocence and Principle of Legality Perspective. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 7(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2025.7.1.28205
Hutama, W. N. (2024). The Position Of Replacement Money As A Principal Criminal In Corruption Crimes That Damage State Financies. Santhet (Jurnal Sejarah Pendidikan Dan Humaniora), 8(2), 1842–1848. https://doi.org/10.36526/santhet.v8i2.4486
Hutapea, D. L. M. O., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Kurniawan, I. D. (2025). Dogmatic and Mens Rea Analysis of State Economic Loss in Indonesian Corruption Law. In Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (pp. 213–228). https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-519-5_17
Iristian, Y. (2023). Pursuit of Fairness: Human Rights and Social Justice in Indonesia’s Legal Landscape. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 2(01), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v2i01.530
Kholik, I., & Warman, E. (2023). Perampasan Harta Benda Terdakwa Sebagai Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Kerugian Negara Dalam Prespektif Keadilan Pancasila. Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(2), 493–503. https://jurnal.universitasdarmaagung.ac.id/jurnaluda/article/view/3030
KMS Herman, Pribowo, J. B. S., Rumondor, N. E., Zamri, H. M., & Budiawan, T. (2024). The Domination of Political Power over Legal Politics in the Deliberation of the Asset Forfeiture Bill. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(1), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.6763
Komalasari, R., & Mustafa, C. (2024). Strengthening asset recovery efforts: A path to mitigating corruption in the public sector. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1042
Kurniawan, F., Alghazali, M. S. D., & Fadhila, A. (2022). Determinasi Upaya Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Peran Kejaksaan terhadap Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(7), 565–588. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.279
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Moiseienko, A. (2017). Book Review: The Limits of Asset Confiscation: On the Legitimacy of Extended Appropriation of Criminal Proceeds. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 8(4), 571–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284417738360
Muti’ah, D., Habibullah, A. W., Djunarto, Y., & Cahyono, L. B. E. (2025). Reconceptualisation of State Financial Losses to Prevent Misuse of Village Funds. Trunojoyo Law Review, 7(2), 361–390. https://doi.org/10.21107/tlr.v7i2.29856
Nugraha, X., Katherina, A. M. F., Agustin, W., & Pamungkas, A. (2019). Non-conviction based asset forfeiture sebagai formulasi baru upaya stolen asset recovery tindak pidana korupsi Indonesia. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 49(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.33331/mhn.v49i1.92
Nugroho, F., Hartiwiningsih, H., & I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani. (2025). Rethinking Subsidiary in Corruption Cases: Indonesian Experiences. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(2), 686–713. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.714
Prayitno, K. P., Oktobrian, D., Sudrajat, T., & Wahyu Handayani, S. (2024). Resolving execution of judgment in Indonesia investment fraud case to ensure asset recovery for victims. Revista Criminalidad, 66(3), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.47741/17943108.663
Riady, R., Febrian, F., Nashriana, N., & Yusuf, M. (2025). Reformulating the Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Corruption Cases: Integrating Positive Law and Islamic Legal Principles. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 25(2), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i2.30483
Rukmono, B. S., Suwadi, P., & Saiful Islam, M. (2024). The Effectiveness of Recovering Losses on State Assets Policy in Dismissing Handling of Corruption. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 4(2), 299–330. https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v4i2.259
Safitri, S. S. (2023). Apakah Skema Perampasan Aset Indonesia Sudah Siap? Telaahan Kritis Paradigma Unexplained Wealth Order Negara Lain. Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW). https://antikorupsi.org/id/apakah-skema-perampasan-aset-indonesia-sudah-siap-telaahan-kritis-paradigma-unexplained-wealth
Saputra, M. R., & Hilyatunisa, N. (2025). An Analysis of Judicial Considerations of the Capitalist Economy in the Tom Lembong Case. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 3(03), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v3i03.1852
Sari, A., & Santiago, F. (2025). Legal Formulation of Substitute Money Charges in Corruption Cases in the Perspective of State Financial Recovery. Jurnal Greenation Sosial Dan Politik, 3(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.38035/jgsp.v3i2.361
Sari, H. P., & Ihsanuddin. (2024). KPK Pamer Pulihkan Aset Hasil Korupsi Rp 2,4 Triliun Selama 2020-2024. Kompas. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2024/12/18/09022471/kpk-pamer-pulihkan-aset-hasil-korupsi-rp-24-triliun-selama-2020-2024
Setiyono, J. (2018). Effectiveness of corruption court in corruption eradication in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175, 012201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012201
Suhartono, A., & Panjaitan, H. (2025). Normative Reconstruction of Asset Forfeiture: A Legal Pathway Following Demise of Corruption Suspects. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(2), 682–707. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i2.511
Suprayoga, B., Hartiwiningsih, & Rustamaji, M. (2023). Reconstruction of State Economic Losses in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 17(4), e03453. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n4-024
Triadi, I., & Atmojo, B. G. (2026). Efforts to Recover Assets from Corruption Crimes through Optimization of Legislation in Indonesia and a Review of the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture. Multidisciplinary Indonesian Center Journal (MICJO), 3(1), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.62567/micjo.v3i1.1609
Wangga, M. S. E., Ahmad, N., Puluhulawa, J., & Swarianata, V. (2024). Periscope of Ideas Selective Criteria for the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4530
Wardani, D. E. K., Anggraeni, M., & Rizal, A. (2025). Legal Strategies for Corruption Asset Recovery and Public Trust. Arena Hukum, 18(3), 340–372. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01803.1
Webb, P. (2005). The United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Journal of International Economic Law, 8(1), 191–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/jielaw/jgi009
Wicaksono, A. A., Hartiwiningsih, H., Rustamaji, M., Suwadi, P., & Nurviani, N. (2025). Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation as a Tool of Asset Forfeiture through an Indonesia’s Ecological Concept. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 3(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v3i3.180
Yohanes, Y., Danil, E., & Mulyati, N. (2023). Peran Kejaksaan dalam Perampasan Aset dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Serta Kendala Yang Dihadapi dalam Pelaksanaannya. UNES Law Review, 6(1), 3818–3831. https://review-unes.com/law/article/view/1187
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hafiz Aulia, Ismansyah, Nani Mulyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
