Factors Affecting the Degree of Staffing Autonomy in Vietnamese Public Universities: An Exploratory Study from Civil Servants’ Perspectives

Nguyen Thi Thuy Duong; Ngo Huong Hoa

doi:10.59653/pancasila.v4i01.2331

Authors

Nguyen Thi Thuy Duong Thu Dau Mot University, Vietnam
Ngo Huong Hoa Thu Dau Mot University, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/pancasila.v4i01.2331

Keywords:

staffing autonomy, university autonomy, public universities, human resource management, Vietnam, higher education governance, institutional theory

Abstract

This study explores the factors influencing the degree of staffing autonomy in Vietnamese public universities from the perspectives of civil servants (including academic staff, administrative professionals, and university managers). A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted with 286 respondents from 12 public universities across Northern, Central, and Southern Vietnam. The questionnaire used a five-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 through Cronbach’s Alpha reliability testing, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Pearson correlation, and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The EFA identified five factors affecting staffing autonomy: (1) Financial Self-Sufficiency (FSS), (2) Institutional Legal Framework (ILF), (3) Internal Governance Capacity (IGC), (4) University Council Effectiveness (UCE), and (5) Organizational Culture of Change (OCC). The regression model explained 62.4% of the variance (Adjusted R² = 0.624). Financial Self-Sufficiency emerged as the strongest predictor (β = 0.312), followed by Institutional Legal Framework (β = 0.258), Internal Governance Capacity (β = 0.214), University Council Effectiveness (β = 0.176), and Organizational Culture of Change (β = 0.134). An independent samples t-test revealed significant differences in perceived staffing autonomy between financially self-sufficient and partially state-funded universities. This is among the first large-scale, multi-institutional quantitative studies on staffing autonomy in Vietnamese higher education that surveys civil servants across occupational categories. The findings provide empirical evidence for policymakers and university administrators to prioritize financial self-sufficiency and legal reform as preconditions for effective human resource autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agasisti, T., & Shibanova, E. (2022). Actual autonomy, efficiency and performance of universities: Insights from the Russian case. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 121–134.

Al Gharsi, A. Y. A., Belhaj, F. A., & Nirmala, R. (2024). Unleashing the university potential: Exploring the impact of staffing autonomy on organizational performance through strategy implementation. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100324.

Al Gharsi, A. Y. A., Belhaj, F. A., Alhada, F. A., & Nirmala, R. (2024). Academic autonomy as driving change: Investigating its effect on strategy development and university performance. Heliyon, 10(9), e29536.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.

Choi, S. (2019). Organizational determinants of university autonomy: A multi-level analysis. Higher Education Policy, 32(3), 391–412.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

Do, P. H. (2023). University autonomy policy in human resources: Case study in Vietnam. Russian Law Journal, 11(5), 223–237.

Estermann, T., & Nokkala, T. (2009). University autonomy in Europe I: Exploratory study. European University Association.

European University Association. (2023). University autonomy in Europe IV: The Scorecard 2023. EUA.

Gawlik, M. A. (2008). Breaking loose: Principal autonomy in charter and public schools. Educational Policy, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904807307058

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Ingersoll, R. M., & May, H. (2012). The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712454326

Lambropoulos, H., Stamelos, G., & Bousiou, O. (2022). THE STAFFING AUTONOMY OF GREEK UNIVERSITIES: AN ATTEMPT AT QUANTIFICATION. European Journal of Management and Marketing Studies, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmms.v7i2.1248

Mai, T. T. N., Pham, T. L., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2022). Academic staff’s participation in university governance—A move towards autonomy and its practical problems. Studies in Higher Education, 47(8), 1628–1643.

Matei, L., & Iwinska, J. (2018). Institutional autonomy revisited: Interface between the public and private dimensions. In A. Curaj et al. (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 671–685). Springer.

Mills, A., Sorensen, A., Gillen, E., Coomer, N. M., Theis, E., Scope, S., Beadles, C., & Quraishi, J. (2020). Quality, Costs, and Policy: Factors Influencing Choice of Anesthesia Staffing Models. Journal of Healthcare Management, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-18-00186

Ngo, H. T., Niem, L. D., Tran, P. C., Nguyen, T. T., Doan, D. T., & Ngo, H. T. (2023). Factors affecting academic staff development in the context of university autonomy through the lens of stakeholders: A case study from Tay Nguyen University, Vietnam. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 411–428.

Nguyen, A. T., Chu, T. H. N., Nguyen, M. T., Ha, T. T. T., & Au, Q. H. (2022). Factors in staffing autonomy affecting academic staff development: A case study in University of Education, Vietnam National University Hanoi. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 19, 1804–1815.

Nguyen, T. T., & Tran, V. H. (2024). Assessing impacts of university autonomy policies on universities’ competitiveness in Vietnam. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 21, 567–582.

Pruvot, E. B., & Estermann, T. (2017). University autonomy in Europe III: The Scorecard 2017. European University Association.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.

Singh, N. S., Kovacs, R. J., Cassidy, R., Kristensen, S. R., Borghi, J., & Brown, G. W. (2021). A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries. In Social Science and Medicine (Vol. 270). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113624

Wei, L. Q., & Lau, C. M. (2008). The impact of market orientation and strategic HRM on firm performance: The case of Chinese enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400395

Wingrove, P., Zuaro, B., Nao, M., Yuksel, D., Littvay, L., & Hultgren, A. K. (2025). University autonomy is a predictor of English medium instruction in European higher education. Higher Education, 90(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01333-8

World Bank. (2023). Policy note on higher education financing in Vietnam. World Bank Group.

Yano, E. M., Soban, L. M., Parkerton, P. H., & Etzioni, D. A. (2007). Primary care practice organization influences colorectal cancer screening performance. Health Services Research, 42(3 I). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00643.x