Fraud Triangle, Use of Information Technology, and Academic Dishonesty of Accounting Students: Testing Religiosity as a Moderator
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jbmed.v3i03.1985Keywords:
Fraud triangle, use of information technology, religiosityAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and the use of information technology on academic fraud and to examine the role of religiosity as a moderator. This research was conducted at the Islamic University of North Sumatra with accounting students as respondents. The sample was selected using purposive sampling with the criteria of accounting students who had previously taken an exam, resulting in 162 respondents. The data obtained will be analyzed using Moderated Regression Analysis with an interaction test approach. This research adopts the fraud triangle theory approach into the realm of education at one Islamic University, which has cultural and academic environmental characteristics based on Islam. Additionally, this research adds the variable of information technology usage, which is relevant to current digital developments, and tests religiosity as a moderator, providing a psychological and moral perspective on students' tendency to cheat. The research findings revealed that rationalization and the use of information technology have a positive and significant impact on academic dishonesty, while pressure and opportunity do not. The interesting findings of this study indicate that religiosity acts as a moderator in the relationship between pressure and rationalization toward academic dishonesty. Educational institutions, particularly accounting study programs, need to instill and internalize religious and ethical values in the learning process, thereby building and strengthening an academic culture of integrity and reducing tolerance for various forms of justification that can encourage cheating.
Downloads
References
Adhikari, G. P. (2021). Calculating the Sample Size in Quantitative Studies. Scholars’ Journal, 4(December), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.3126/scholars.v4i1.42458
Afedzie, R., & Onyina, P. (2022). Ethical use of information technology in higher education. In Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2023.2213267
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. https://doi.org/10.47985/dcidj.475
Al-Thani, H. (2025). Religion and spiritual well-being: a qualitative exploration of perspectives of higher education faculty in Qatar and its challenge to western well-being paradigms. Frontiers in Psychology, 16(April), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1549863
Alguacil, M., Herranz-Zarzoso, N., Pernías, J. C., & Sabater-Grande, G. (2024). Academic dishonesty and monitoring in online exams: a randomized field experiment. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 36(3), 835–851. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09378-x
Ali, W., Aftab, A., Nur, A. C., Ibrahim, A. R., & Mohamed, A. A. (2024). Investigating Factors Leading to Develop Academic Dishonesty and Cheating Behaviors During Board Examinations in Balochistan, Pakistan. Jurnal Lingua Idea, 15(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2024.15.1.10904
Alsabhan, W. (2023). Student Cheating Detection in Higher Education by Implementing Machine Learning and LSTM Techniques. Sensors, 23(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084149
Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11(June 2024), 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506818764762
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H
Benitez, J. A., & Wingenbach, G. (2025). Masks Off: Exploring Undergraduates’ Motivations to Cheat During COVID-19. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(4), 1593–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09616-0
Çelik, Ö., & Razı, S. (2023). Facilitators and barriers to creating a culture of academic integrity at secondary schools: an exploratory case study. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-023-00125-4
Chala, W. D. (2021). Perceived seriousness of academic cheating behaviors among undergraduate students: an Ethiopian experience. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00069-z
Chan, C., Ananthram, S., Thaker, K., & Liu, Y. (2022). Do religiosity and ethical principles influence ethical decision-making in a multi-faith context? Evidence from India. Journal of Business Research, 149, 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.065
Cheng, Y. C., Hung, F. C., & Hsu, H. M. (2021). The relationship between academic dishonesty, ethical attitude and ethical climate: The evidence from Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111615
Chiang, F. K., Zhu, D., & Yu, W. (2022). A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(4), 907–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12656
Choo, F., & Tan, K. (2023). Abrupt academic dishonesty : Pressure , opportunity , and deterrence. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100815
Clinciu, A. I., Cazan, A. M., & Ives, B. (2021). Academic Dishonesty and Academic Adjustment Among the Students at University Level: An Exploratory Study. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211021839
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Cressey, D. R. (1950). The Criminal Violation of Financial Trust. American Sociological Review, 15(6), 738–743. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086606
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design Qualitative: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications, Inc (Fifth Edit). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469237-3
Désiron, J. C., & Petko, D. (2023). Academic dishonesty when doing homework: How digital technologies are put to bad use in secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11225-y
Dias-Oliveira, E., Morais, C., Pasion, R., & Hodgson, J. (2024). “It Is No Big Deal!”: Fraud Diamond Theory as an Explanatory Model for Understanding Students’ Academic Fraudulent Behavior. SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241266091
Dogi, D. C. P., Mangoting, Y., & Hokil, C. (2025). Beyond Attitudes: Spiritual Intelligence and Rationalization as Predictors of Academic Dishonesty. International Journal of Organizational Behavior and Policy, 4(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.9744/ijobp.4.2.77-90
Elsayed, K. G., Lestari, A. A., & Fotini, F. A. (2023). Role of Religion in Shaping Ethical and Moral Values Among the Youths in Athens, Greece. Journal of Sociology, Psychology & Religious Studies, 5, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t5153
Enciso, R., & Bueno, D. C. (2024). Upholding Academic Integrity: Strategies for Fostering Plagiarism Awareness and Prevention among MAEd Science Education Students. Institutional Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal, 7(8), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29088.19207
Eshet, Y. (2024). Academic Integrity Crisis: Exploring Undergraduates’ Learning Motivation and Personality Traits over Five Years. Education Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090986
Gaumann, N., & Veale, M. (2024). AI providers as criminal essay mills? Large language models meet contract cheating law. Information and Communications Technology Law, 33(3), 276–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2024.2352692
Guruge, D. B., Kadel, R., Shailendra, S., & Sharma, A. (2025). Building Academic Integrity: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a New Framework to Address and Prevent Contract Cheating. Societies, 15(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010011
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis. In Pearson Education (Seventh Ed). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0_3
Huang, C. L., Shao, X., Wu, C., & Yang, S. C. (2025). Navigating the digital learning landscape: insights into ethical dilemmas and academic misconduct among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00516-2
Jamaluddin, S. F., & Lufityanto, G. (2021). The Paradox of Integrity: Cheating Awareness Among Religious High School Student in Yogyakarta [Paradoks Integritas: Kesadaran akan Perilaku Kecurangan di Kalangan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Berbasis Agama di Yogyakarta]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, Vol. 36. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i1.2500
Karimi, S., Liobikienė, G., & Alitavakoli, F. (2022). The Effect of Religiosity on Pro-environmental Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Iranian Rural Female Facilitators. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.745019
Krou, M. R., Acee, T. W., Pino, N. W., & Hoff, M. A. (2019). Rationalizing the Decision to Cheat: An Empirical Analysis to Determine Whether Social Rational Orientation Can Predict Academic Dishonesty. Journal of College and Character, 20(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2194587x.2018.1559196
Leaton Gray, S., Edsall, D., & Parapadakis, D. (2025). AI-Based Digital Cheating At University, and the Case for New Ethical Pedagogies. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(4), 2069–2086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09642-y
Marksteiner, T., Nishen, A. K., & Dickhäuser, O. (2021). Students’ Perception of Teachers’ Reference Norm Orientation and Cheating in the Classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(February). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.614199
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633
McIntire, A., Calvert, I., & Ashcraft, J. (2024). Pressure to Plagiarize and the Choice to Cheat: Toward a Pragmatic Reframing of the Ethics of Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030244
Miles, P. J., Campbell, M., & Ruxton, G. D. (2022). Why Students Cheat and How Understanding This Can Help Reduce the Frequency of Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 20(2), a150–a160. https://doi.org/10.59390/lxmj2920
Nelson, A. S., Santamaría, P. V., Javens, J. S., & Ricaurte, M. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Use in Academic Writing in English as a Foreign Language †. Education Sciences, 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15050611
Okolo, E. C., Appiah, I., & Wingenbach, G. (2025). Conflicts between academic misconduct and University honor codes: implications for ethical behavior. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-025-00198-3
Onu, D. U., Onyedibe, M. C. C., Ugwu, L. E., & Nche, G. C. (2021). Relationship between religious commitment and academic dishonesty: is self-efficacy a factor? Ethics and Behavior, 31(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1695618
Ortiz-bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2
Pikhart, M., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2025). Reporting the potential risk of using AI in higher Education: Subjective perspectives of educators. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 18(February), 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100693
Putri, C. M., Rahmawati, N., & Bashir, U. (2025). Examining the role of religiosity in shaping ethical perceptions of creative accounting among accounting students. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 26(2), 842–857. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v26i2.26561
Ridwan, R., & Diantimala, Y. (2021). The positive role of religiosity in dealing with academic dishonesty. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1875541
Sari, D. E., Asila, N. F., Mustofa, R. H., Suranto, Jatmika, S., Ahmad, N. L., … Fadhilah, R. (2025). Using the Fraud Triangle framework to explore the impact of information technology misuse on academic fraud in accounting education: evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2476302
Sayidah, N., Hartati, S. J., & Muhajir. (2020). Academic cheating and characteristics of accounting students. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.5430/IJFR.V11N1P189
Singh, J., Sadiq, M., & Kaur, K. (2020). Integrating ethical sensitivity through religiosity in accounting education. Accounting, 6(6), 975–982. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.7.022
Sozon, M., Mohammad Alkharabsheh, O. H., Fong, P. W., & Chuan, S. B. (2024). Cheating and plagiarism in higher education institutions (HEIs): A literature review. F1000Research, 13(May), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.147140.2
Sozon, M., Pok, W. F., Sia, B. C., & Alkharabsheh, O. H. M. (2024). Cheating and plagiarism in higher education: a systematic literature review from a global perspective, 2016–2024. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, (September), 2016–2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-12-2023-0558
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (Seventh Ed). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181158-21
Taşkın, N., & Kokoç, M. (2025). Behavioural engagement, academic dishonesty, and performance gaps: Comparing online and paper–pencil based tests in an online learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 30(13), 18895–18919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13514-8
van den Berg, E., & Rothmann, S. (2024). Twenty-first-century competencies and capabilities for financial accounting students. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 27(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v27i1.5535
Vučković, D., Peković, S., Blečić, M., & Đoković, R. (2020). Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students᾽performance: student and teacher perspectives. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00065-3
Yan, L. (2025). Are effects of academic stress on students’ learning motivation and screen device usage consistent in different stressful scenarios? Acta Psychologica, 257(May), 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105108
Yu, H., Glanzer, P. L., & Johnson, B. R. (2021). Examining the relationship between student attitude and academic cheating. Ethics and Behavior, 31(7), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1817746
Zhao, L., Mao, H., Compton, B. J., Peng, J., Fu, G., Fang, F., … Lee, K. (2022). Academic dishonesty and its relations to peer cheating and culture: A meta-analysis of the perceived peer cheating effect. Educational Research Review, 36(April), 100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100455
Zhao, L., Yang, X., Yu, X., Zheng, J., Mao, H., Fu, G., … Lee, K. (2024). Academic Cheating, Achievement Orientations, and Culture Values: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241288240
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramadona Simbolon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



















