Legal Protection of Bank Customer Regarding Bank Credit Agreements According to the Consumer Protection Law

Authors

  • Hotman Sinambela Universitas Mpu Tantular

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i03.235

Keywords:

legal protection, bank customer, credit agreement, consumer protection law

Abstract

The main objective of the research is to find out, describe and analyze whether the standard clauses in Rural Bank credit agreements (BPR) reflect the credit agreement and do not conflict with the principles of freedom of contract and the principle of balance as well as the impact of implementing standard clauses in Rural Bank credit agreements and legal protection. against customers who are harmed by the application of the standard clause. The research results reveal that the application of standard clauses in BPR credit agreements has fulfilled the principles of freedom of contract, balance and the principle of consensualism because in their application they still open up room for negotiation with customers so that an agreement is reached. The impact of implementing the standard clauses of Rural Bank credit agreements on customers' rights as consumers is that customers do not have room to defend their rights or to file complaints due to the application of standard clauses which are detrimental or burdensome, especially with the "take it or leave it" analogy to the terms. - conditions determined by the bank, which include the bank's authority to unilaterally at any time without any reason and without prior notice terminate the credit withdrawal permit. In the case of sales of collateral whose credit is bad, the BPR has the authority to unilaterally determine the selling price of the collateral. Legal protection for customers who are harmed by the application of standard clauses in credit agreements is the customer or consumer. The customer can apply to the BPR according to the protection provided by Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliyeva, N. (2021). Familiarization with the Materials of the Criminal Case as a Guarantee of Protection of the Rights of the Accused. Legal Concept, 4. https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2020.4.20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/lc.jvolsu.2020.4.20

Averitt, N. W., & Lande, R. H. (1997). Consumer sovereignty: A unified theory of antitrust and consumer protection law. Antitrust Law Journal, 65(3).

Eske Yuniel Rahmanto Sonora. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PIHAK BANK DALAM HAL TERJADINYA KREDIT MACET DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT PADA PT. BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT (BPR) PALU LOKADANA UTAMA CABANG POSO. Tadulako Master Law Journal, 5(2).

Febiani, A., Fajri, M., Putra, M., Hukum, M. I., Indonesia, U., & Barat, J. (2023). DALAM KONTRAK STANDAR PERJANJIAN BANK GARANSI Legal Protection for Debtors in Bank Guarantee Agreements Standard Contract. 23, 245–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.V23.245-254

Ita, I., Dewi, A. T., & Sitompul, R. M. (2022). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JAMINAN AGUNAN DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT MODAL KERJA (KMK) (Studi Kasus Putusan No.466/Pdt.G/2020/PT.Mdn). Law Jurnal, 3(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v3i1.2296

Kosytsia, O., Kolesnikova, M., Kadala, V., Muzychuk, O., & Baranova, V. (2019). Institution of whistleblowers: Characteristic features and guarantees of protection. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(Special Issue 2).

Maulana, RS, M. A., Sulistyani, D., Arifin, Z., & Soegianto, S. (2021). Klausula Baku Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Standard Clause in the Credit Contract. Jurnal USM Law Review, 4(1), 208–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v4i1.3369

Nguyen, C., & Pacheco, A. (2022). Confidentiality in loan credit agreements. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2020-0532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-10-2020-0532

Ni Made Yunika Andrini, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, P. A. S. W. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITUR FIDUSIA YANG TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN ( STUDI DI PT . BANK PERKREDITAN RAKYAT. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 4(2), 207–213.

Pomar, F. G., & Perarnau, S. C. (2023). How to defining features fo financial contracts influence Restitution and Gap-filling in Unfair Contract Terms: The Case of Foreign Currency Loans in Europe. InDret, 2.

Rade, S. D., Tae, M. Y. F., Asman, F. K. M., & Huler, K. G. W. (2023). Legal Protection of Creditors in Credit Agreements at Swastisari Kupang Credit Union. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 1(02). https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.81

Rahman, H., Hirsanuddin, & Muhaimin. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Nasabah Yang Menggunakan Fasilitas Kredit Perbankan (Studi di PD. BPR NTB Lombok Tengah). Insitut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 10(2), 721–728.

Tavuyanago, S. (2020). The interface between competition law and consumer protection law: An analysis of the institutional framework in the Nigerian Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act of 2019. South African Journal of International Affairs, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.1837231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.1837231

Thomas, K. (2018). Analysing the notion of ‘Consumer’ in China’s consumer protection law. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxy010

Thomas, K. (2022). Amending China’s Notion of a “Consumer”: Lessons from Comparative Analysis of the PRC Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Consumer Policy, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09518-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09518-3

Zapata Quimbayo, C. A., & Mejía Vega, C. A. (2023). Credit risk in infrastructure PPP projects under the real options approach. Construction Management and Economics, 41(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2151023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2151023

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Sinambela, H. (2023). Legal Protection of Bank Customer Regarding Bank Credit Agreements According to the Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 1(03), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i03.235

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 03 (2023): September 2023

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Hotman Sinambela

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).