Problem of Determining Past Income for Children in Court the Decisions

Authors

  • Masnuah Lisa Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i01.8

Keywords:

Māḍiyah maintenance, children, religious court

Abstract

The data obtained were then analyzed using the content analysis method. Decision Religious shows that the legal basis for refusing claims for māḍiyah maintenance for children in divorce is legal considerations as considered by the Supreme Court in its decision rejecting lawsuits for past maintenance for children, namely that the father's obligation to provide for his child is lil-intifā’, not lit -tamlīk, then a person's negligence fathers who do not provide for their children cannot be sued. This leads to injustice because māḍiyah maintenance is not granted to children. This will certainly be detrimental to the life and welfare of the child, who in other circumstances can become a shield for a father who neglects to provide for his child. Māḍiyah's livelihood is a form of protection for the rights of divorced women and children born during a marriage. This is in line with the verses of the Koran and hadith which talk about the obligation of a father to his wife and children to provide maintenance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alauddin, A. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Tanggung Jawab Ayah Kandung Terhadap Nafkah Anak Setelah Perceraian. Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 1(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v1i1.96

Devy, S., & Muliadi, D. (2020). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menetapkan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian (Studi Putusan Hakim Nomor 0233/Pdt.G/2017/MS-MBO). El-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v2i1.7646

Devy, S., & Suci, D. M. (2020). The implementation of verdict execution on providing Mađiyah maintenance following divorce according to islamic law (Case study in Syar’iyyah Court Banda Aceh). In Samarah (Vol. 4, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.6179

Fadri, K., Mukhlis, M., & Yusrizal, Y. (2020). KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA TERHADAP PEMBEBANAN NAFKAH ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL. Suloh:Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29103/sjp.v8i1.2488

Iksan, & Adnan. (2020). Gugatan Konvensi Dan Rekonvensi Dalam Bingkai Syariat Islam (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 603/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Bm.). Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.34304/fundamental.v1i2.21

Indonesia, K. A. R. (2013). Al-Qur’anulkarim Maqdis: Mushaf Al-Qur’an Tajwid dan Terjemah. Cordoba Internasional-Indonesia.

Jamaluddin, Nanda Amalia, & Laila M. Rasyid. (2015). WOMEN AND DIVORCE: LEGAL JUSTICE STUDY OF SOCIETAL AND JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE TOWARD UNRECORDED DIVORCE IN ACEH, INDONESIA. US-China Law Review, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.17265/1548-6605/2015.08.002

Masrukhin, M., & Damayanti, M. (2020). Hukum Progresif Penanganan Hak Nafkah Anak dalam Kasus Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Karesidenan Surakarta). Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22515/al-ahkam.v5i1.1794

Sujono, I. (2022). Legal Review of Marriage for Divorced Women Outside the Religious Courts. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v1i1.10

Supriyadi, S. (2022). REKONSTRUKSI KEDUDUKAN ANAK AKIBAT PERKAWINAN SIRRI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DENGAN PENDEKATAN HUKUM PROGRESIF. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.29-39

Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif terhadap Permohonan Nafkah Māḍiyah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat (Studi Komperatif). (2020). Syaksia : Jurnal Hukum Perdata Islam, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.37035/syakhsia.v20i1.1983

Widyakso, R. (2018). EKSEKUSI NAFKAH PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA MALANG. Ulumuddin, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/ulum.v11i1.10409

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

How to Cite

Lisa, M. (2023). Problem of Determining Past Income for Children in Court the Decisions. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 1(01), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i01.8