Legal Certainty In Financial Disputes Case Resolution Progressive Legal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v2i02.845Keywords:
Financial Disputes, Legal Certainty, Progressive Legal PerspectiveAbstract
Pure Legal Theory (The Pure Theory of Law) is a positive legal theory. However, it does not discuss positive Law that applies in a particular legal system; it only discusses general legal theory. Hans Kelsen's presentation of Pure Legal Theory aims to explain the nature of Law and methods of making Law rather than explaining what the Law should be or the best way for Law to be created. This writing uses descriptive legal research, in which the author uses a normative juridical research type using the Library Research data collection method. This research aims to determine how the legal certainty and protection of the parties in mediating the resolution of Sharia financial disputes, a comparison of progressive legal analysis of Hans Kelsen and Satjipto Raharjo's legal theory in resolving Sharia financial disputes. Based on the research and discussion results, a picture is obtained that legal certainty (rechtssicherheit) Legal certainty is the certainty of laws or regulations; all kinds of methods, methods, and so on must be based on laws or regulations. Within legal certainty, there are positive laws and written laws. Normative legal certainty is when a regulation that regulates it clearly and logically is created and promulgated. Progressive Law wants to return the Law to the right track (on the right track). For this reason, Satjipto Rahardjo thinks that legal breakthroughs are needed (legal breakthroughs, not legal breaking) in law formation and enforcement.
Downloads
References
Absori, A., & Achmadi, A. (2017). Transplantasi Nilai Moral dalam Budaya untuk Menuju Hukum Berkeadilan (Perspektif Hukum Sistematik Ke Non-Sistematik Charles Sampford).
Arinanto, S. (2011). Memahami Hukum: Dari Konstruksi Sampai Implementasi.
Finch, J. D. (1979). Introduction to legal theory.
Gunawan, I. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: teori dan praktik. Bumi Aksara.
Hasanah, S. F., Ja’far, A. K., & Fasa, M. I. (2021). Konstruksi Hukum Progresif; Urgensinya Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah. EKSYA: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 100–119.
Jameel, N. (2014). Hakim Progresif, Mengurai Benang Kusut Ketidak tertiban Masyarakat diIndonesia. Academia. Edu.
Kelsen, H. (1935). The pure theory of law. LQ Rev., 51, 517.
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia.
Mertokusumo, S. (2012). Legal theory. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Munthe, M. D. (2013). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERBANDINGAN HONORARIUM NOTARIS TERKAIT AKTA JAMINAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN PASAL 36 UU NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2004 DAN LAMPIRAN PP NOMOR 86 TAHUN 2000. UAJY.
Musjtari, D. N. (2013). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Media Hukum, 20(2).
Nurhadi, N. (2019). Teori Hukum Progresif Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Bisnis Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 14(2), 154–167.
Nuryadi, H. D., & Sh, M. H. (2016). Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2), 394–408.
Pranadita, N. (2018). Pemodelan Implementasi Hukum: Peranan Manajemen Strategis dalam Implementasi Hukum. Deepublish.
Putra, M. R. P. Y., & Rahayuningsih, T. (2023). Implications of Case Resolution Mechanism Due to Press Coverage through Non-Litigation Channels. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 2(01), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v2i01.425
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Sodiq, M. (2014). DUALISME HUKUM DI INDONESIA: Kajian Tentang Peraturan Pencatatan Nikah dalam Perundang-Undangan. AL AHWAL Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 7(2), 109–120.
Sujono, I., & Nugroho, M. (2023). Omnibus Law as Investment Law Reform in Indonesia Based on the Hierarchy of Legislation Principles. Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies, 1(02 SE-Articles), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.28
Turiman, T. (2010). Memahami Hukum Progresif Prof Satjipto Rahardjo Dalam Paradigma" Thawaf". Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 1–72.
Utomo, S. (2020). Penerapan hukum progresif dalam penyelesaian konflik agraria. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 33–43.
Warassih, E., Medan, K. K., & Mahmutarom. (2005). Pranata Hukum: sebuah telaah sosiologis. Suryandaru Utama.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ferdinand Sembiring, Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
