Comparative Analysis of Competition Authority Decisions Based on Mergers and Acquisitions in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia

Asmah Asmah

doi:10.59653/jplls.v1i02.85

Authors

Asmah Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i02.85

Keywords:

Competition Authorities, Merger, Acquisitions, Business Competition

Abstract

In order to compare merger and acquisition decisions made by competition authorities in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia, this study will investigate each country's decisions. This study aims to pinpoint the variations in the strategies and practices used by competition authorities in the three nations and examine how they affect the preservation of healthy economic competition and the general welfare. The research involves gathering and studying merger and acquisition-related decisions made by competition authorities in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia. Differences in each nation's determination of the approval requirements, oversight procedures, and sanctions were discovered through this investigation. The findings demonstrate that there are differences between the strategies used by competition authorities in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines in relation to mergers and acquisitions. The applied threshold standards, sanctions policies, and legal interpretations vary. The results shed light on the initiatives taken by each nation to uphold fair competition and consumer protection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi Fahmi Lubis,dkk, 2017, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, KPPU, Jakarta.

Asmah, 2020, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Asean, Rajawali Grafindo, Jakarta.

Asmah, 2017, Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Hakikat Fungsi KPPU), SIGn, Makassar.

Castellan, C. M. (2010). Quantitative and qualitative research: A view for clarity. International journal of education, 2(2), 1.

Cumming, D., Jindal, V., Kumar, S., & Pandey, N. (2023). Mergers and acquisitions research in finance and accounting: Past, present, and future. European Financial Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12417

Das, K. K., & Khatoon, S. (2020). Mergers And Acquisitions In Indian Corporate Sector: A Critical Review Of Literature. Editorial Board, 9(7).

Drexel, J. (Ed.). (2012). Competition policy and regional integration in developing countries. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Rahmadi Usaman, 2013, Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Susanti Adi Nugroho, 2012, Hukum Persaingan usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik serta penerapannya, Kencana Media, Jakarta.

Abdul Muthalib dan S Endang Prasetyawati, 2018, Kajian Harmonisasi Hukum Persaingan Tiga Negara Anggota Asean Berdasarkan The Asean Regional Guildelines On Competition Policy, CEPALO, Vol,2 No.1 Jan-Jun, http://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo

Desi Apriani, Syafrinaldi, 2022, Konflik Norma Antara Perlindungan Usaha Kecil Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha Indonesia Dengan Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol 4, No.1

Lin, T. C., & Pursiainen, V. (2023). Social trust distance in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106759

Ma, J., Pagan, J. A., & Chu, Y. (2009). Abnormal Returns to Mergers and Acquisitions in Ten Asian Stock Markets. International Journal of Business, 14(3).

Miller, J. P. (1941). Unfair Competition: A Study in Criteria for the Control of Trade Practices. Harvard university press

Nadya Angelina, Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, 2022, Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan Menurut Antimonopoli (Perbandingan Hukum Indonesia Dengan Korea Selatan), Jurnal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, Vol. 4 No.1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.25105/refort.v4i1.13406

Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology (pp. 1-12). Rijeka: IntechOpen.

Undang-Undang Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia, (33).

Wang, X. (2008). Highlights of China's new anti-monopoly law. Antitrust Law Journal, 75(1), 133–150.