Animal Abuse in the View of Islamic Criminal Law

Salman Farizi

doi:10.59653/jplls.v1i01.9

Authors

Salman Farizi Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jplls.v1i01.9

Keywords:

Jinayah Jurisprudence, Criminal Law, Animal Abuse

Abstract

Islam as the majority religion in Indonesia teaches us to be a mercy to the universe, including taking care of animals on earth. However, Indonesia is the country with the largest number of downloaders of animal abuse content in the world. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze these problems from the perspective of jurisprudence. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and analysis of Islamic legal theories. The results of this study indicate that the crime of mistreatment of animals in Indonesia is regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP) Article 302 and Article 540, as well as Law Number 18 of 2009 as amended by Law Number 41 of 2014 concerning Animal Husbandry and Health. Animal abuse in jinayah fiqh is included in the ta'zir finger, in which the level and punishment are determined by the government ( ulil amri ).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afzal, M., & Khubaib, M. (2021). Flexibility in the implementation of islamic criminal law in modern islamic society in the light of qur’ān and Sunnah. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/JITC.111.21

Bartelink, E. J., Clinkinbeard, S., Spessard, C., Kilmartin, A., & Spangler, W. L. (2022). Documenting non-accidental injury patterns in a dog abuse investigation: A collaborative approach between forensic anthropology and veterinary pathology. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14948

Bègue, L. (2022). Explaining Animal Abuse Among Adolescents: The Role of Speciesism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7–8). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959643

bin Muhamad, M. M., Shariff, A. A. M., Rajamanickam, R., Rahman, M. A., Zahid, A., & Ismail, N. (2015). Qarinah: Admissibility of circumstantial evidence in hudud and qisas cases. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2p141

BIP, T. (2021). 3 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum, KUHPer, KUHP, KUHAP. Grahamedia Press.

Campbell, A. M. (2022). The Intertwined Well-Being of Children and Non-Human Animals: An Analysis of Animal Control Reports Involving Children. Social Sciences, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020046

Cârciumaru, E., Popa, I. A., & Ciobotaru-Pîrvu, E. (2022). Bite Wounds and Animal Abuse: Review of 24 Cases. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpa.2021.11.030

Chandra, W. D., & Astuti, P. (2018a). PENEGAKAN HUKUM PASAL 302 KUHP TENTANG PENGANIAYAAN TERHADAP HEWAN DI KOTA SURAKARTA. NOVUM: JURNAL HUKUM.

Chandra, W. D., & Astuti, P. (2018b). Penegakan Hukum Pasal 302 KUHP tentang Penganiayaan Terhadap Hewan di Surakarta. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 5(4), 1–8.

Da Silva Brandão, T., Dantas Neto, A. M., De Sousa Alves, A., Ximenes, R. G., Bezerra, K. P. G., De Lima Brasil, A. W., Da Nóbrega, S. C. A., Da Silva, R. M. N., & De Souza, A. P. (2022). Animal abuse and interpersonal violence from the perspective of veterinarians from Paraíba State, Brazil. Semina:Ciencias Agrarias, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2022v43n3p1269

Fitzgerald, A. J., Barrett, B. J., Gray, A., & Cheung, C. H. (2022). The Connection Between Animal Abuse, Emotional Abuse, and Financial Abuse in Intimate Relationships: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Sample of the General Public. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520939197

Hasan, M. R., & Azman, N. N. A. N. (2022). Baby Dumping in Malaysia and Indonesia: Between National Regulation and Islamic Criminal Law. Mazahib, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i2.3361

Ireland, J. L., Birch, P., Lewis, M., Mian, U., & Ireland, C. A. (2022). Animal Abuse Proclivity Among Women: Exploring Callousness, Sadism, and Psychopathy Traits. Anthrozoos, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2021.1944560

Ismail, W. N. H. W., Nordin, L., Salleh, F. I. M., Benedict, W., Hanafi, M. A., Taib, M. H. M., & Ren, R. G. (2020). Hudud: The right of allah swt in perspective of punishment for adultery. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.169

Muri, K., Augusti, E. M., Bjørnholt, M., & Hafstad, G. S. (2022). Childhood Experiences of Companion Animal Abuse and its Co-Occurrence with Domestic Abuse: Evidence from a National Youth Survey in Norway. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24). https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211072176

Rahman, M. M., Yunus, K., & Alenezi, R. (2018). Ethical Considerations in Exploiting, Culturing and Killing Fish towards Animal Rights in Islam. International Medical Journal Malaysia, 17. https://doi.org/10.31436/IMJM.V17I2.949

Riggs, D. W., Baum, N. G., Taylor, N., & Beall, J. (2022). Reports of Animal Abuse in Child Protection Referrals: A Study of Cases from One South Australian Service. Child Abuse Review, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2720

Sujono, I., Mangesti, Y. A., & Suhartono, S. (2022). THE SELLER’S LIABILITY DUE HIDDEN DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS IN THE ONLINE SELLING AND BUYING TRANSACTION BASE ON UUPK. International Journal of Law Reconstruction, 6(2), 257–277.

Wolf, L. R., Galdioli, L., Brugnerotto, M., Ramos, M. G., & Garcia, R. de C. M. (2022). Analysis of reported animal abuse in Campo Magro, Paraná, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 59. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2022.183392

Yani, A., Suryadi, R. A., & Nurrohman, N. (2020). STUNNING ON ANIMALS SLAUGHTER ON ISLAMIC LAW PERSPECTIVE. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v18i1.1103

Yusuf, M. (2021). QANUN HUKUM JINAYAH DALAM BINGKAI TEORI PEMBUATAN HUKUM. LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v10i2.11343