Relationship between Financial Performance ESG Score: An Empirical Analysis of Listed Companies on Indonesia Stock Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/jbmed.v3i01.1217Keywords:
Capital Expenditure, Revenue Growth, ESG ScoreAbstract
This study investigates the relationship between financial performance—capital expenditure (CapEx) and revenue growth—and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). A panel data regression analysis was conducted using data from 21 firms selected through purposive sampling for 2018–2022. The results show that revenue growth significantly impacts ESG scores, with a coefficient of 1.023 (p = 0.026). This suggests that firms with higher revenue growth are more likely to achieve better ESG performance due to their greater financial flexibility to invest in sustainability initiatives. In contrast, CapEx negatively affects ESG scores, with a coefficient of -0.0014 (p = 0.037). This indicates that higher CapEx does not necessarily align with improved ESG performance, as such expenditures are often directed toward projects that may overlook environmental and social considerations. The findings underscore the importance of aligning financial strategies with sustainability goals. Companies experiencing strong revenue growth demonstrate better capacity to support ESG integration, while high CapEx investments, if not strategically aligned with sustainability, may hinder ESG progress. This study contributes to the literature on financial performance and ESG, offering insights for corporate decision-makers to balance growth and sustainability in their strategies.
Downloads
References
Aboud, A. &. (2018). The impact of social, environmental and corporate governance disclosures on firm value: Evidence from Egypt. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies.
Albarrak, M. S. (2019). The Effect Of Carbon Dissemination On Cost Of Equity . Business Strategy and the Environment.
Buallay, A. H. (2020). Sustainability reporting and firm’s performance: Comparative study between manufacturing and banking sectors. . International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3.
Chatterji, A. K. (2016). Corporate social responsibility ratings: The effect of measurement on firm performance. Bussines Management.
Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 20(1).
Criselda, S. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Capital Expenditure. Jurnal Ekonomi, SPESIAL ISSUE.
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management ScienceVol. 60, No. 11.
Freeman, R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2014). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment Volume 5, 2015 - Issue 4.
Hart, S. L. (1996). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30–37.
Hocky, A., & Wijaya, E. (2024). The Effect Of Leverage, Revenue Growth, And Total Asset Turnover On Profitability Of Listed Companies In The Basic Materials Sector In Indonesian Stock Exchange Period 2017-2022. Procuratio : Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen.
Husada, E. V. (2021). Pengaruh Pengungkapan ESG Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bei Periode 2017-2019). Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(2).
Inawati, W. A. (2023). Dampak Environmental, Social, Dan Governance (ESG) Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi.
Lee, M. T. (2022). Understanding The Effect Of Enviroment, Social, and Governance Conduct On Financial Performance: Arguments For A Process And Integrated Approch Modelling. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship.
Melgarejo, M. (2019). The impact of corporate governance on earnings quality: evidence from Peru. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, volume 9, issue 4.
Peter M. Clarkson, Y. D. (2011). Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.
Raynor, M. E. (2009). The Strategy Paradox: Why Committing to Success Leads to Failure (and What to Do About It. New York: Currency Doubleday.
Safriani, M. N. (2020). Pengaruh environmental, social, governance (ESG) disclosure terhadap kinerja perusahaan. Journal of Accounting.
Zheng, G.-W., Siddik, A. B., Masukujjaman, M., & Fatema, N. (2021). Factors Affecting the Sustainability Performance of Financial Institutions in Bangladesh: The Role of Green Finance. Sustainability, 13(18).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lukman Hakim, Dito Wahyutomo, Dewi Oktayani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).