Influence of Fraud Hexagon on Fraudulent Financial Reports within State-Owned Companies Listed on the IDX in 2019-2023

Authors

  • Jaiyanti Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Nela Safelia Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ridwan Universitas Jambi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jbmed.v2i03.964

Keywords:

financial stability, ineffective monitoring, change of auditor, change of directors, arrogance, collusion

Abstract

The phenomenon of financial statement fraud, which has a very large loss effect compared to other forms of fraud despite its low number of incidents, is the reason behind this study. Aside from that, there are still instances of financial statement fraud that call for additional investigation to determine how different independent variables—like financial stability, inadequate oversight, shifting directors or auditors, arrogance, and collusion—affect the dependent variable of financial statement fraud. The quantitative study makes use of secondary data from corporate annual reports. State-owned enterprises (BUMN) that were listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange between 2019 and 2023 made up the study's population. Purposive sampling was used in the sampling process, resulting in 16 corporate samples over the course of five years and a total of 80 observation data points. Logistic regression analysis is the method of data analysis that is applied. The study's findings demonstrate that, in contrast to the factors of financial stability, change of auditor, change of directors, and arrogance, which have no effect on financial statement fraud, inefficient supervision and collaboration have a substantial impact.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACFE. (2019). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. In: Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia Chapter.

ACFE. (2020). Occupational Fraud: A Report to the Nations, ACFE (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners).

ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Repot to the Nations, ACFE (Association of Certified Fraud Examiners).

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Azizah, A. N., & Henny, D. (2023). Pengaruh Elemen Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Sektor Consumen Non Cyclicals Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2018-2021. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(2), 3723–3732. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i2.18187

Carla, & Pangestu, S. (2021). Deteksi Fraudent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Fraud Pentagon. ULTIMA Accounting, 13, 125–142.

Handoko, B. L. (2021). Fraud Hexagon Dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud Perusahaan Perbankan Di Indonesia. In Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi (Vol. 5, Issue 2). http://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/jka

Ijudien, D. (2018). Pengaruh Stabilitas Keuangan, Kondisi Industri Dan Tekanan Eksternal Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 2(1), 82–97.

Jannah, V. M., Andreas, & Rasuli, M. (2021). Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan. SAKI : Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(1).

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure. In Journal of Financial Economics (Vol. 3). Q North-Holland Publishing Company.

Kurniawan, A., & Trisnawati, R. (2021). Hexagon Fraud Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Statetment: Studi Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2016-2019. SEMINAR NASIONAL & CALL FOR PAPER HUBISINTEK. www.acfe.com

Larum, K., Zuhroh, D., & Subiyantoro, E. (2021). Fraudlent Financial Reporting: Menguji Potensi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. AFRE (Accounting and Financial Review), 4(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.26905/afr.v4i1.5957

Lionardi, M., & Suhartono, S. (2022). Pendeteksian Kemungkinan Terjadinya Fraudulent Financial Statement menggunakan Fraud Hexagon. Jurnal Akuntamsi Dan Keuangan, 9. http://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/moneter

Nadziliyah, H., & Primasari, N. S. (2022). Analisis Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Financial Statement Fraud Pada Perusahaan Seoktor Infrastruktur, Utilitas Dan Transportasi. Accounting and Finance Studies, 2(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.47153/afs21.2702022

Nurbaiti, A., & Putri, A. A. (2023). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Teori Fraud Hexagon. In Jurnal Studi Akuntansi dan Keuangan (Vol. 6, Issue 1).

Oktaviany, F., & Reskino. (2023). FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD: PENGUJIAN FRAUD HEXAGON DENGAN MODERASI AUDIT COMMITTEE. JURNAL BISNIS DAN AKUNTANSI, 25(1), 91–118. http://jurnaltsm.id/index.php/JBA

Putri, F. M., & Fadilah, S. (2023). Analisis Faktor–Faktor Fraud Diamond dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Transportasi yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2019-2021. Bandung Conference Series: Accountancy, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsa.v3i1.6061

Ramadhan, F. H. (2022). Pengaruh Faktor Tekanan Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Transportasi yang Terdafar di Bursa Efek Indoneesia (BEI) Tahun 2018-2020. Jurnal Manajemen & Akuntansi Prabumulih, 6, 19–27.

Ratnasari, M., & Rofi, M. A. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Memotivasi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Journal of Management and Bussines Review. www.bpk.go.id

Romney, M. B., & Steinbart, P. J. (2014). Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (M. Masykur, Ed.; Edisi 13). Salemba Empat.

Setyono, D., Hariyanto, E., Wahyuni, S., & Pratama, B. C. (2023). Penggunaan Fraud Hexagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner : Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(2), 1036–1048. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i2.1325

Sholikatun, R., & Makaryanawati, M. (2023). Determinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory). EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 7(3), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2023.v7.i3.5484

Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. Advances in Financial Economics, 13, 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005

Sukma, E., & Daswan, L. (2023). Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan: Financial Target, Nature of Industry, dan Perubahan Auditor dengan Komite Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderasi (Studi Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019. Research Business and Economics Studies, 3(1), 61–73. http://ejournal.iainkendari.ac.id/robust

Suryandari, N. N. A., & Endiana, I. D. M. (2019). Fraudulent Financial Statement (pertama). CV. Noah Aletheia.

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. THE CPA JOURNAL, 1–5. https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/facpubs

Downloads

Published

2024-06-21

How to Cite

Jaiyanti, J., Safelia, N., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Influence of Fraud Hexagon on Fraudulent Financial Reports within State-Owned Companies Listed on the IDX in 2019-2023. Journal of Business Management and Economic Development, 2(03), 1264–1275. https://doi.org/10.59653/jbmed.v2i03.964