The practicality of student worksheets on the Scientific Creativity project-based Learning (SCPjBL) model to improve scientific creativity as a creative process for Physics Education students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/pancasila.v2i03.1143Keywords:
Practicality, model SCPjBL, Scientific CreativityAbstract
The aim of this reseach was to describe the practicality of the SCPjBL model, based on the results of the implementation of scientific investigations to improve students' scientific creativity on Student Worksheets (LKM). The method in this study is the development of a modified model and applied in universities in 2024. The sample in this study was 90 students from two different universities. Data were collected based on the results of validation and observation of the implementation of the SCPjBL model. The assessment instrument used an implementation observation sheet carried out by two observers. The observation sheet was filled in by four observers who were divided into two observers who were tasked with observing the implementation of the SCPjBL model phase, and two others observed student activities, the results of the observations were then analyzed quantitatively. The results of the study were in the form of implementation results by obtaining an average score of 3.72 with an average validity percentage of 91% with a very practical category. The results of the practicality of the SCPjBL model and its supporting devices obtained a score of 3.56 with an average implementation percentage reaching 91%. Based on the results of the study, the SCPjBL model was declared practical and feasible for use.
Downloads
References
Altiparmak, T., & Eryilmaz-Muştu, Ö. (2021). The Effects of Scamper Technique Activities in the 8th Grade Simple Machines Unit on Students’ Academic Achievement, Motivation and Attitude towards Science Lessons*. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.1.155
Ananda, L. R., Rahmawati, Y., & Khairi, F. (2023). Journal of Technology and Science Education. 13(1), 352–367.
Andres, E. C. A., & Rosalinda, B. (2023). Online Flipped Learning Model in a College Physical Education Course. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 413–425.
Arend, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. In Mc Graw Hill (Ninth Edit, Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1 https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103
Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The practicality and effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) model by using PhET simulation to increase students’ scientific creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11426a
Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2014). Objective Measure of Scientific Creativity : Psychometric Validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test Objective measure of scientific creativity : Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13(October 2018), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001
Borg, W.R & Gall, M. . (1983). Eucation research: an introduction. (4th Editio). Longman Inc.
Cheli, S., Chiarello, F., & Cavalletti, V. (2023). A psychotherapy oriented by compassion and metacognition for schizoid personality disorder: A two cases series. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-022-09566-3
Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: the makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384
Dwikoranto, Jatmiko, B., Hariyono, E., Lestari, N. A., Prahani, B. K., & Suyidno. (2021). MobLen Model for Enhancing Scientific Creativity of Physics Students: An Alternative in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012006
Herieb, De Vries Toddi, L. (2017). Scientific Creativity : Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school. 24, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912
Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psichology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Mukhopadhyay, R. (2013). Scientific Creativity- A New Emerging Field of Research : Some Considerations. 2(1), 1–9.
Pennequin, V., Questel, F., Delaville, E., & ... (2020). Metacognition and emotional regulation in children from 8 to 12 years old. British Journal of …. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12305
PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1, 1–9. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.
Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082
Rahayu, S., Setyosari, P., Hidayat, A., & Kuswandi, D. (2022). the Effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving-Flipped Classroom for Enhancing Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Online Physics Educational Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39709
Rahmawati, Y., Afrizal, A., Astari, D. D., Mardiah, A., Utami, D. B., & Muhab, S. (2021). The integration of dilemmas stories with stem-project-based learning: Analyzing students’ thinking skills using hess’ cognitive rigor matrix. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1292
Sukma Anggreini, I., Muhyi, M., & Ketut, I. (2023). Hakikat Ilmu Dan Pengetahuan Dalam Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(17), 396–402.
Sulisworo, D. (2020). Konsep_Pembelajaran_2010.pdf (p. 74).
Suyidno, S., Susilowati, E., Arifuddin, M., Sunarti, T., Siswanto, J., & Rohman, A. (2020). Barriers to Scientific Creativity of Physics Teacher in Practicing Creative Product Design. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012048
Yustina, y., & suwondo, S. (2015). Sikap Ilmiah dan Kreativitas Produk pada Isu Lingkungan melalui Pembelajaran Berbasiskan Proyek. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 8(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v8i2.3876
Zulkarnaen, Z.A. Imam Supardi, B. J. (2017). Feasibility Of Creative Exploration , Creative Elaboration , Creative Modeling , Practice Scientific Creativity , Discussion , Reflection ( C3pdr ) Teaching Model To Improve Students ’ Scientific Creativity Of. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 1020–1034. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.1020
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Maimon Sumo, Budi Jatmiko, Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
