lndonesia-Europe Asymmetry Trade Agreement Post-Brexit UK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/pancasila.v1i01.71Keywords:
Brexit, Asymmetry Agreement, Timber Industry, European Union, Trade AgreementAbstract
This study aims to estimate how the asymmetry of the agreement between the UK and Indonesia post-Brexit. A literature review on international trade agreements was carried out by tracing agreement data stored in the database of the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the 2010-2019 period. The result is that there is only one trade agreement between Indonesia and the UK, which is related to the Fourth Stage Multi-stakeholder Forestry Program (4th-MFP) project. In the same period, Indonesia also participated in a trade agreement with the European Union called the Voluntary Partnership Agreement - Forest Law Enforcement Governance and Trade (VPA-FLEGT). The VPA-FLEGT is asymmetric in favor of the European Union while the MFP is asymmetric in favor of Indonesia. After analyzing the two agreements, it was found that the tendency is that the UK will continue to encourage asymmetry due to its strict environmental laws and large demand for timber. The asymmetry will encourage Indonesia to continue supplying Britain with timber from legal sources post-Brexit.
Downloads
References
Adler-Nissen, R., Galpin, C., & Rosamond, B. (2017). Performing Brexit : How a post-Brexit world is imagined outside the United Kingdom. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(3), 573–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117711092
Buhmann, K., & Nathan, I. (2012). Plentiful forests, happy people? The EU’s FLEGT approach and its impact on human rights and private forestry sustainability schemes. Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 2, 53–82.
Buongiorno, J., Johnston, C., & Zhu, S. (2017). An assessment of gains and losses from international trade in the forest sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 80, 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.004
Dhingra, S., Ottaviano, G., & Sampson, T. (2017). A hitch-hiker’s guide to post-Brexit trade negotiations: options and principles. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(S1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx005
Dimitriu, C. (2014). Free trade and exploitation. Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofia, 62, 101–108.
Erbaugh, J., Nurrochmat, D., & Purnomo, H. (2017). Regulation, formalization, and smallholder timber production in northern Central Java, Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 91(5), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0037-6
Fishman, A., & Obidzinski, K. (2015). Verified Legal? Ramifications of the EU Timber Regulation and Indonesia’s Voluntary Partnership Agreement for the Legality of Indonesian Timber. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 10–19.
Garcia, F. J., Ciko, L., Gaurav, A., & Hough, K. (2015). Reforming the International Investment Regime: Lessons from International Trade Law. Journal of International Economic Law, 18, 861–892. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgv042
Gómez-Mera, L., & Barrett, B. (2012). The Political Economy of Preferential Trade Agreements: Latin America and Beyond. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(1), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2012.00147.x
Heyvaert, V., & Cavoski, A. (2017). UK Environmental Law Post Brexit. Environmental Law Network International Review, 1, 2–10.
Holmes, P., Rollo, J., & Winters, L. A. (2016). Negotiating the UK’s post Brexit trade arrangements. National Institute Economic Review, 238(1), 22–30.
Indrawati. (2016). Peran Sektor Bisnis Dalam Penandatanganan Voluntary Partnership Agreement On Forest Law Enforcement Governance And Trade (VPA-FLEGT) antara Indonesia dan Uni Eropa. Global Insight Journal, 01(1), 38–54.
Jeffree, M. (2019). EU wood promotion programmes and their recognition of FLEGT.
Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Persetujuan Kemitraan Sukarela antara Republik Indonesia dan Uni Eropa tentang Penegakan Hukum Kehutanan, Penatakelolaan, dan Perdagangan Produk Kayu ke Uni Eropa (2014).
Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Memorandum Saling Pengertian antara Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia dan Kementerian Pertanian dan Lingkungan Hidup Republik Finlandia tentang Kerjasama Bidang Kehutanan dan Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam (2017).
Kementerian Luar Negeri RI. Surat Pengaturan Antara Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia dan Departemen Pembangunan Internasional Kerajaan Inggris Raya Mengenai Kerja Sama untuk Mendukung Perdagangan Produk Kayu yang Dipanen secara Legal dan Pengelolaan Huta (2018).
Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., & Aurenhammer, H. (2014). Forest Policy and Economics Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
Martono, D. S., & Rahayu, S. (2017). Estimasi Kandungan Karbon Pohon Mahoni (Swietinea macrophylla, King) Penyusun Hutan Rakyat Bersertifikat SVLK (Sistem Verifikasi Legalitas Kayu) (Studi Kasus di PPHR Lawu Lestari Kecamatan Panekan Kabupaten Magetan). Agri-Tek: Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian, Kehutanan Dan Agroteknologi, 17(2), 36–41.
Maryudi, A. (2016). Choosing timber legality verification as a policy instrument to combat illegal logging in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 99–104.
Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions : Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(51), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010051
Richards, M., & Hobley, M. (2016). Empowering civil society in forest policies and governance: livelihood impact assessment of EU FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreements. The International Forestry Review, 18(3), 345–356.
Rutt, R. L., Myers, R., Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Mcdermott, C. (2018). FLEGT : Another ‘forestry fad’? Environmental Science and Policy, 89, 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.012
Sabastian, G. E., Yumn, A., Roshetko, J. M., Manalu, P., Martini, E., & Perdana, A. (2019). Adoption of silvicultural practices in smallholder timber and NTFPs production systems in Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 93(2), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0155-9
Sahide, M., Maryudi, A., Supratman, & Giessen, L. (2016). Forest Policy and Economics Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.04.002
Sudrajat, A., Hardjanto, & Sundawati, L. (2016). Partisipasi Petani dalam Pengelolaan Hutan Rakyat Lestari : Kasus di Desa Cikeusal dan Desa Kananga Kabupaten Kuningan. Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika, 07(1), 8–17.
Suryatmojo, H. (2014). Recovery of Forest Soil Disturbance in the Intensive Forest Management System. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 832–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.101
Syamsu, I. F., Hardjanto, & Hero, Y. (2019). Pinjaman Tunda Tebang Hutan Rakyat: Siapa yang Mengakses? (Studi Kasus : Hutan Rakyat di Bojonegoro). Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 9(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.1.114-127
Trejo-Mathys, J. (2013). Towards a Critical Theory of the World Trade Organization : Thinking with Rawls beyond Rawls. Constellations, 20(3), 459–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12051
Zeitlin, J., & Overdevest, C. (2019). Experimentalist Interactions: FLEGT and the Transnational Timber Legality Regime. Amsterdam. Retrieved from ttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3406065
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Princes Catherine, Anthony Morgan, Tania Safira

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).