Global Communication as Herald of Global Citizenship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1479Keywords:
Citizenship, Civic Engagement, Globalisation, Social Media, TechnologyAbstract
In an era characterised by unprecedented interconnectedness and rapid technological advancements, global communication emerges as a pivotal force shaping contemporary notions of citizenship. The transformative role of global communication in heralding a new era of citizenship, one that transcends traditional boundaries and fosters inclusive engagement on a global scale is the focus of this study. The study is anchored on an interdisciplinary theoretical framework such as the network society theory, theory of global citizenship, and the agenda-setting media theory. The study is based on a survey-based approach and relied on questionnaire as instrument of data collection. Findings showed that there is relationship between global communication and global citizenship. However, the study also showed that factors that influence individuals' perception of identity are in the form of diverse cultures, globalisation and international trade (economic factors), social interactions, media representations, and political events as well as social issues. Furthermore, the study revealed that social media and related technology have promoted global awareness and citizen engagement. Researchers concluded that global communication serves as a herald of citizenship by facilitating cross-cultural dialogue, empowering civic engagement, and fostering a sense of global belonging. Embracing the transformative potential of global communication offers new opportunities for building a more inclusive, empathetic, and socially responsible form of citizenship in the 21st century. It was recommended, among others, that government and other stakeholders must promote digital inclusion through digital literacy programmes across underserved communities.
Downloads
References
Aina, S. (2023). Global communication and the media agenda. Abeokuta: Julian Publishers.
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalisation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bagdikian, B. H. (2020). The media monopoly (6th ed.). Beacon Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalisation of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boli, J. (2018). Rights and rules: Constituting world citizens. C. L. McNeely (ed.), Public Rights, Public Rules: Constituting Citizens in the World Polity and National Policy. New York.
Caplan, G. (2017). Advancing free media, open markets, open media forum, November 1997.
Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Curran, J. (eds.) (2015). Mass media and society (4th ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
Delanty, G. (2000). Citizenship in a global age: Society, culture, politics. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Eriksen, E. (2020). The end of citizenship: New roles challenging the political order. In C. McKinnon & I. Hampsher-Monk (eds.), The demands of citizenship. London: Continuum.
Falk, R. (2019). The making of global citizenship. In B. van Steenbergen, (ed.), The condition of citizenship, London: Sage Publications.
Goldberg, D., Stefaan, G. V., & Prosser, T. (2018). Regulating the changing media: a comparative study. Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (2019). Citizenship and national identity. In B. van Steenbergen, (ed.), The condition of citizenship. London: Sage Publications.
Howard, P. N., & Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy's fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab spring. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manovich, L. (2021). The language of new media. New Zealand. Leonardo Digital Review.
McChesney, R. W. (2019). The new global media; it's a small world of big conglomerates. The Nation Magazine, November 29, 2019.
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187.
McNeely, C. L. (2018). Constituting citizens: Rights and rules. In C. L. McNeely (ed.), Public rights, public rules: Constituting citizens in the world polity and national policy. New York: Garland.
Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2002). The CNN effect: The myth of news, foreign policy and intervention. London: Routledge.
Terry, F. (2015). New media: An introduction (2nd ed.). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Thussu, D. K. (2006). International communication: Continuity and change. London: Bloomsbury.
Uche, L. U. (2016). North-South information culture: Trends in global communications and research paradigms: Lagos: Longman Nigeria Plc.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe Report.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Peter Iorper Ugondo, Stephen Victor Gana, Kelvin Inobemhe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).