Effect of Error Culture and Learning Organization Principles on Performance Enhancement Strategies within Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i03.1936Keywords:
Error Culture, Learning Organization, Performance Enhancement, Organizational Learning, Organizational Performance, Psychological Safety, Error ManagementAbstract
This comprehensive literature review examines the intricate relationship between error culture, learning organization principles, and performance enhancement strategies within contemporary organizations. Through systematic analysis of empirical studies, theoretical frameworks, and meta-analytical research, this article synthesizes existing knowledge to establish how organizational approaches to error management and learning culture significantly influence performance outcomes. The findings demonstrate that organizations fostering constructive error management cultures—characterized by psychological safety, open communication, and systematic learning from mistakes—consistently outperform those maintaining error-averse environments. Similarly, organizations implementing learning organization principles, including systematic problem-solving, experimentation, knowledge transfer, and continuous improvement, exhibit superior performance across multiple dimensions. The analysis reveals that these two constructs interact synergistically, creating a powerful foundation for sustainable performance enhancement. This article contributes to organizational theory by providing an integrated framework that connects error culture, learning organization principles, and performance enhancement strategies, offering practical implications for organizational development and future research directions.
Downloads
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley.
Bhat, V., Garg, P., & Agrawal, R. (2014). The impact of learning organization dimensions on organizational performance in Indian hospitals. Journal of Health Management, 16(2), 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972063414524515
Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00056.x
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
DeNisi, A. S., & Murphy, K. R. (2017). Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress? Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000085
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1018
Frese, M. (1995). Error management in training: Conceptual and empirical results. In C. Zucchermaglio, S. Bagnara, & S. Stucky (Eds.), How people learn to become effective workers: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Development of Professional Expertise (pp. 95-125). NATO Scientific Affairs Division.
Frese, M., & Keith, N. (2015). Action errors, error management, and learning in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111235
Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 3-27). Oxford University Press.
Hofmann, D. A., & Frese, M. (2011). Errors in organizations. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 151-174). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12169-005
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672. https://doi.org/10.2307/256741
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
Keith, N., & Frese, M. (2008). Effectiveness of error management training: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.59
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press.
Ortenblad, A. (2013). A critical review of the learning organization literature: A meta-analysis of definitions and frameworks. The Learning Organization, 20(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471311288526
Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate.
Reason, J., Parker, D., & Lawton, R. (1990). Organizational controls and safety: The varieties of rule-related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00518.x
Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), 536-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency.
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Thomason, S. J. (2020). Cultural influences on error management in organizations: A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(4), 312-330.
Van Dyck, C., Frese, M., Baer, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2005). Organizational error management culture and its impact on performance: A two-study replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1228-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1228
Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2003). Summing up: Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 232-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002007
Yang, B., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2004). The construct of the learning organization: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1088
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Belal Dahiam Saif Ghaleb

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).














