Effectiveness of Group Guidance and Discussion Techniques and Its Effect on Level Social Interaction of Mosque Youth

Authors

  • Rahmad Rahmad Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v1i03.229

Keywords:

Group Guidance, Discussion Techniques, Mosque Youth

Abstract

This article explains the effectiveness of group guidance and discussion techniques and their influence on the level of social interaction among mosque youth.As social beings in the community, teenagers always carry out a process of social interaction with fellow individuals and other groups in community life. However, the ability to interact among adolescents is still low and some even have difficulty adjusting to social interactions. This research is a quantitative study using the pre-experimental design method, type one group pretest-posttest (preliminary test, final test of a single group). The total population was 12 mosque teenagers, because this research was conducted on teenagers from the Nurul Iman Pasirpengaraian mosque. Data were collected using questionnaires and observations and using a total item correlation limit of rix 0.25 as the item selection criterion. Assessment analysis can be obtained from the results of calculating pretest and posttest scores. The acquisition of pretest and posttest scores is carried out in several stages. The initial stage is the pretest activity, and the final stage is the posttest activity. The results of this study indicate that the level of social interaction among adolescents at the Nurul Iman mosque, before being given treatment, is still classified as in the low category which is in the interval range 47 to 56. Then it has increased from 47.58 to 79.25, which means that group guidance and discussion techniques have an effect on adolescent social interactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiruddin, Zen. 2010. Statistik Pendekatan. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Andarbeni, Sari Lisdian. Studi tentang Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial AnakKelompok A dalam Kegiatan Metode Proyek di TK Plus AL-FALLAH Pungging Mojokerto. Jurnal BK UNESA. Vol. 04. No. 01. 2013.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Astiti, Dini Tias. 2012. " Meningkatkan Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial MelaluiBimbingan Kelompok pada Siswa Program Aselerasi SD Hj. IsriatiBaiturahman Semarang. Skripsi. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidika Universitas Semarang. Semarang.

Azwar, Saifuddin. (2015). Tes Prestasi Fungsi dan Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi Belajar, Edisi II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Bimo, Walgito. 2003. Psikologi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.Binti maunah, Supervisi Pendidikan Islam, Yogyakarta: Teras, 2009.

Binti Maunah. 2009. Ilmu Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Teras.

Dwi Priyatno, (2008). Mandiri Belajar SPSS. Yogyakarta, Mediakom.

Fabiana Meijon Fadul. (2019). 済無No Title No Title No Title. 13–36. Interaksi K., Remaja, S., & Tulungagung, I. (2021). Jurnal Al-Taujih. 7(1), 29–37.

Khurotul Aini, Luluk & Mochamad Nursalim. 2012. Penerapan Bimbingan Kelompok dengan Teknik Sosiodrama untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial di Lingkungan Sekolah.

Fairuzry dkk. Analisis Perbedaan Pemahaman Antara Experienced dan Non Ekperience Smartphone User Terhadap Application Permission. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer. Vol. 1, No. 10, Oktober 2017.

Fatnar dkk. 2014. Kemampuan Interaksi Sosial Remaja yang Tinggal Dipondok Pesantren Dengan yang Tinggal Bersama Keluarga. Jurnal Fakultas Psikologi. Vol. 2, No 2.

Irawan, DR. Soehartono, 2004. Prosedur Penelitian Sosial. PT Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.

Iskandar. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial: Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press.

Komalasari, Garantina dkk.2016. Asesment Teknik Non-tes dalam Perspektif BK Komprehensif. Jakarta: PT Indeks.

Laksono, Naufan Rahmansyah. 2017. "Pengaruh Interaksi Sosial Terhadap Motivasi Kerja pada Mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang yang Bekerja Part Time". Skripsi. Universitas Islam Maulana Malik Ibrahim. Malang.

Lamajau, Eresia. Peningkatan Kemampuan Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa Kelas V SDN Sampaka Kec. Bualemo Kab. Banggai Melalui Metode Diskusi Kelompok. Jurnal Kreatif Online. Vol. 5 No. 1.

M. Quraish Shihab, tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur'an Vol. 11. Jakarta: Lentera, 2003.

M. Quraish Shihab. 2002. Tafsir al-Misbah. Jakarta. Lentera Hati. Vol VII.

Malentika, Nella dkk. Hubungan Antara Interaksi Sosial dengan Suasana Hati pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmiah PSYCHE. Vol. 11. No. 2, Desember 2017.

Martono, Nanang. 2011. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: PT Raya Grafindo Persada.

Prayitno dkk. 2017. Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok dan Konseling Kelompok. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Priyatno, Dwi. 2008. Mandiri Belajar SPSS Untuk Analisis dan Uji Statistik. Jakarta. Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Romlah, Tatiek 2001. Teori dan Praktik Bimbingan Kelompok. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Santosa, Slamet. 2014. Teori-Teori Psikologi Sosial. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Suharso Puguh, 2009. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif unuk Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Remaja Rosida Karya.

Sugiyono. 2005. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-08

How to Cite

Rahmad, R. (2023). Effectiveness of Group Guidance and Discussion Techniques and Its Effect on Level Social Interaction of Mosque Youth. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 1(02), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v1i03.229