Navigating Hardships: A Mixed Method Approach of Academic Resilience amid Catastrophes among First Generation Learners of Kashmir

Authors

  • Altaf Hussain Ganie School of Education and Behavioural Sciences, University of Kashmir, India
  • Hilal Ahmad Malla School of Education and Behavioural Sciences, University of Kashmir, India
  • Mohammad Yousuf Ganai School of Education and Behavioural Sciences, University of Kashmir, India
  • Omiya Division of Agricultural Statistics, Shalimar, SKUAST-K, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v3i03.1844

Keywords:

Catastrophes, Academic Resilience, First generation learners, Kashmir

Abstract

This study was intended to examine the impact of catastrophes among first generation learners of Kashmir and consequently how they responded the adversities. The study employed the descriptive and explanatory design. In the descriptive survey method 300 first generation learners were used as sample by means of purposive sampling with 150 male and 150 female pupils. The academic resilience was measured by means of Academic Resilience scale by Mihir Kr. Mallick and Simranjit Kaur (2017). The statistical techniques employed to measure the academic resilience are Percentage and t-Test. The results revealed that that out of 300 first generation learners of Kashmir 12, 75, 151, 38, 9, 9, and 6 have extremely high, high, above average, average, below average, low and extremely low academic resilience respectively i.e. 4%, 25%, 50.33%, 12.67%, 3%, 3% and 2%. Besides a significant difference was observed between male and female first generation learners of Kashmir, males were found to be more resilient than females. The in-depth analysis by means of interview suggested that most of the first generation learners of Kashmir are having sound academic resilience and they manage successfully the adversities like covid-19 lockdown by means of their personal positive efficacy beliefs and strong social cohesion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alva, S. A. (1991). Academic invulnerability among Mexican American students: The importance of protective resources and appraisals. Hispanic Journal of BehavioralSciences, 13, 18-34.

Bhat, N.A.(2020). Education In Kashmir: Scenario Within Double Lockdown—Covid-19 & Conflict. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology. 17(7).

Chaturvedi, K. Vishwakarma, D. K.,&Singh,N.(2021). COVID-19 and its impact on education, social life and mental health of students: A survey. Children and Youth Services Review. 121.

Creswell, J. W., & David Creswell, J. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.

Dauber, S. L., Alexander, K. L., &Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Tracking and transitions through the middle grades: Channeling educational trajectories. Sociology of Education, 69, 290-307.

Dole, C., Hayashi, R., Poe, A., Sarat, A., &Wolfson, B. (2016). When iscatastrophe?: An introduction. The Time of Catastrophe. Routledge: 1-18.

Howard, S. & Johnson, B. (2000). What makes the difference? Children and teachers talk about resilient outcomes for children 'at risk'. Educational Studies, 26, 321-337.

Jimerson, S., Egeland, B., &Teo, A. (1999). A longitudinal study of achievement trajectories: Factors associated with change. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 116-126.

Kurtaliqi, F., Lancelot Miltgen, C., Viglia, G., & Pantin-Sohier, G. (2024). Using advanced mixed methods approaches: Combining PLS-SEM and qualitative studies. Journal of Business Research, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114464

Mallick, M. Kr. & Kaur, S. (2017). Manual for Academic Resilience Scale. National psychological corporation Agra India.

Mahapatra, A., Sharma,P. (2020). Education in times of COVID-19 pandemic: Academic stress and its psychosocial impact on children and adolescents in India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 1(3).

Mannan, A. (2019). Education Paralysis in Kashmir: Need to Protect the Future. Observer Research Foundation.

Sahu, P. (2020). Closure of universities due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staff. Cureus, 12(4), e7541.

Sarmiento,A.S., Ponce,R.S. &Bertolin, A.G. (2021). Resilience and COVID-19. An Analysis in University Students during Confinement. Educ. Sci., 11, 533. https://doi.org/10.3390/

Syrjä, P., Puumalainen, K., Sjögrén, H., Soininen, J., & Durst, S. (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation in firms with a social mission - a mixed-methods approach. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2019.1602016

Takona, J. P. (2024). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. In Quality and Quantity (Vol. 58, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2

Thomeer, M. B., Brantley, M., & Hernandez, E. M. (2024). Using mixed methods approaches to study families and relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12974

Wang, M. C., Haertal, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). Educational resilience in inner cities. In M. C. Wang & E. W. Gordon (Eds.), Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects (pp. 45-72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Weeden, K. A., & Benjamin, C. (2020). The small-world network of college classes: implications for epidemic spread on a university campus. Sociological Science, 7, 222–241.

Weyant, E. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231

Xiang, Y. T., Li, W., Zhang, Q., Jin, Y., Rao, W. W., Zeng, L. N., et al. (2020). Timely research papers about COVID-19 in China. The Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30375-5.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-13

How to Cite

Ganie, A. H., Malla, H. A., Ganai, M. Y., & Omiya, O. (2025). Navigating Hardships: A Mixed Method Approach of Academic Resilience amid Catastrophes among First Generation Learners of Kashmir. Journal of Education Method and Learning Strategy, 3(03), 541–548. https://doi.org/10.59653/jemls.v3i03.1844