Forecasting of Biogas and Biomethane Outputs from Anaerobic Co-digestion Using Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Networks (MLP-ANN)

Authors

  • D.A. Samuel University of Suffolk, UK
  • B.I. Eziefula Chevron Nigeria, Nigeria
  • Gbushum Orkuma Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria
  • Abdulgafar Usman Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University, Makurdi, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1529

Keywords:

Anaerobic Co-digestion, Artificial Neural Networks, Biogas Output Prediction

Abstract

The intricate, nonlinear interactions between several process parameters make it difficult to accurately forecast biogas and methane (CH₄) yields in anaerobic digestion systems. Conventional kinetic models frequently do not capture these dynamics well, particularly in co-digestion systems with heterogeneous substrates. This was addressed by developing and testing a Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Network (MLP-ANN) for predicting cumulative biogas and CH₄ production from the anaerobic co-digestion of soymilk dregs and cow manure. Different pH values, substrate mixing ratios, and hydraulic retention durations were used to operate batch-mode digesters. Three input parameters, one hidden layer with three neurons, and two output nodes that represented the yields of methane (CH4) and biogas made up the feed-forward ANN architecture. The result showed negligible prediction errors and very high coefficients of determination (R2) of 0.999 for both outputs, and the model exhibited exceptionally accurate predictive power. The average relative errors for the training and testing stages were 0.002 and 0.004, respectively, confirming the model's excellent generalization capabilities. These findings support the optimization of anaerobic digestion systems by validating the MLP-ANN as a reliable and efficient forecasting method. This MLP-ANN can be used for forecasting biogas and CH₄ outputs based on pH values, substrate mixing ratios, and hydraulic retention times.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Avinash, L. S., & Mishra, A. (2024). Comparative evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-based Models and Kinetic Studies in the Prediction of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion of MSW. Fuel, 367, 131545.

Farizawani, A. G., Puteh, M., Marina, Y., & Rivaie, A. (2020). A review of artificial neural network learning rule based on multiple variants of conjugate gradient approaches. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 529(2) p. 022040. IOP Publishing.

Gustafsson, M., Meneghetti, R., Souza Marques, F., Trim, H., Dong, R., Al Saedi, T., Rasi, S., Thual, J., Kornatz, P., Wall, D., Berntsen, C., Saxegaard, S., Lyng, K.A., Nägele, H.J., Heaven, S., Bywater, A. (2024). A perspective on the state of the biogas industry from selected member countries. Gustafsson, M., Liebetrau, J. (Ed.) IEA Bioenergy Task 37, 2024:2

IBM SPSS (2021). Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Ibrahim, M., Haider, A., Lim, J. W., Mainali, B., Aslam, M., Kumar, M., & Shahid, M. K. (2024). Artificial neural network modelling for the prediction, estimation, and treatment of diverse wastewaters: A comprehensive review and future perspective. Chemosphere, 142860.

Itodo, I. N., Bala, E. J., & Sambo, A. S. (2021). Biogas technology in Nigeria. CRC Press.

Jang, H. M., et al. (2018). Prediction of methane production potential of anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste using artificial neural networks. Bioresource Technology, 248, 179–187.

Komarysta, B., Dzhygyrey, I., Bendiuh, V., Yavorovska, O., Andreeva, A., Berezenko, K., ... & Maidanskyi, I. (2023). Optimizing biogas production using artificial neural network. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 122(8).

Kougias, P. G., & Angelidaki, I. (2018). Biogas and its opportunities—A review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12, 1-12.

Ling, J. Y. X., Chan, Y. J., Chen, J. W., Chong, D. J. S., Tan, A. L. L., Arumugasamy, S. K., & Lau, P. L. (2024). Machine learning methods for the modelling and optimisation of biogas production from anaerobic digestion: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(13), 19085-19104.

Mohd-Ali, J., Hussain, M. A., Tade, M. O., & Zhang, J. (2015). Artificial Intelligence techniques applied as estimator in chemical process systems – A literature survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(14), 5915–5931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.03.023

Montesinos-Lopez, O. A., Montesinos López, A., & Crossa, J. (2022). Multivariate statistical machine learning methods for genomic prediction (p. 691). Springer Nature.

Olatunji, K. O., Madyira, D. M., Ahmed, N. A., Adeleke, O., & Ogunkunle, O. (2023). Modelling the biogas and methane yield from anaerobic digestion of Arachis hypogea shells with combined pretreatment techniques using machine learning approaches. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 14(4), 1123-1141.

Orkuma, J. G., Samuel, D. A., Eziefula, B. I., & Kantiok, D. Y. (2025). Assessment of Biogas potential of Codigested Cow Manure with Soymilk Dreg. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10 (3).

Sarma, M., Sarma, K. K., Sarma, M., & Sarma, K. K. (2014). Fundamental considerations of ANN. Phoneme-Based Speech Segmentation using Hybrid Soft Computing Framework, 47-75.

Surra, E., Bernardo, M., Lapa, N., Esteves, I., Fonseca, I., Mota, J.P., (2019). Biomethane production through anaerobic co-digestion with Maize Cob Waste based on a biorefinery concept: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 249: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019. 109351

Downloads

Published

2025-05-14

How to Cite

Samuel, D., Eziefula, B., Orkuma, G., & Usman, A. (2025). Forecasting of Biogas and Biomethane Outputs from Anaerobic Co-digestion Using Multilayer Perceptron Artificial Neural Networks (MLP-ANN). International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 3(02), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1529