Contextualizing Procurement Maturity: Lessons from Government Procurement for Enhancing Regional-Owned Enterprise (BUMD) Performance

Authors

  • Nandang Sutisna Asia e University. Malaysia
  • Titik Khawa Abdul Rahman Asia e University. Malaysia
  • Shazali bin Mansor i-CATS University College, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1568

Keywords:

Procurement Maturity Model, Public Procurement, Hybrid Governance, Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMDs), Strategic Procurement

Abstract

Procurement governance represents a strategic function critical to the success of public organizations, particularly Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMDs), which operate under hybrid mandates combining public service delivery and market competitiveness. This study critically examines the applicability of the Indonesia Procurement Maturity Model (IPM2) to BUMDs and proposes an adapted conceptual framework better suited to their unique governance complexities. Through analytical deconstruction, the study finds that while elements such as transparency, accountability, and technology utilization in IPM2 are directly adoptable, significant adjustments are necessary in organizational structures, competency frameworks, and risk management approaches. Rigid elements tied to governmental budget cycles and inspectorate-driven oversight are deemed incompatible with BUMD operational realities. An adapted maturity model is proposed, positioning procurement as a strategic enabler supported by five interconnected adaptive dimensions: Strategic Human Capital Development, Agile Institutional Structures, Performance-Driven Management Systems, Strategic Technological Integration, and Proactive Risk and Opportunity Management. Grounded in contingency theory and contemporary hybrid governance literature, the model reframes procurement maturity as a dynamic, value-driven system rather than a linear, compliance-oriented progression. This research offers both a practical roadmap for BUMDs and a conceptual contribution to the evolving field of procurement governance in hybrid public organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abduh, M., Sukardi, S. N., Wirahadikusumah, R. D., Oktaviani, C. Z., & Bahagia, S. N. (2023). Maturity of procurement units for public construction projects in Indonesia. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(13), 2171–2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15623599.2022.2046941

Akbar, M. L. (2022). Manajemen Perubahan Dalam Peningkatan Tingkat Kematangan Unit Kerja Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah di Indonesia. Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Alhusban, M., Nasereddin, M., Alghossoon, A., & Hatamleh, M. T. (2025). A hybrid conceptual procurement framework for BIM uptake to enhance buildings’ sustainability performance in the Jordanian public sector. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 43(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-07-2022-0109

Aulia, D., & Isvara, W. (2021). Strategies to Increase Procurement Maturity Level using Procurement Maturity Model to Improve Procurement Performance. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 11(6), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.11.06.2021.p11465

Bals, L. ;, Laine, J. ;, Mugurusi, & Godfrey. (2015). Evolving procurement organizations: A contingency model for structural alternatives Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen. Econstor. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/181885

Darmapramita, I. G. U., Salain, I. M. A. K., & Nadiasa, M. (2015). Analisis Tingkat Kematangan (Maturity Levels) Unit Layanan Pengadaan Kabupaten Badung. Jurnal Spektran, 3(2).

Efridha, N., Nasution, B., Nasution, F. A., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Analisis Akibat Hukum Kekayaan Daerah yang Dipisahkan Pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (BUMD) Dikaitkan Dengan Kebijakan Direksi dalam Kegiatan Bisnis. Recht Studiosum Law Review, 2(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.32734/rslr.v2i1.12114

Fadlila, A. K. (2024). Relationship between public procurement governance and the performance of government agencies in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 4(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.55324/IJOMS.V4I2.1026

Grossi, G., & Thomasson, A. (2015). Bridging the accountability gap in hybrid organizations: The case of Copenhagen Malmö Port. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314548151

Hua, S. Y. (2022). Procurement maturity and IT failures in the public sector. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 16(4), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2022-0097

Ilahiyyah, E. N., Puhotomo, D., & Sriyanto. (2017, March 22). Pengukuran Kinerja Pengadaan Barang/Jasa dengan Menggunakan Indonesia Procurement Maturity Model di Unit Layanan Pengadaan Universitas Diponegoro. Industrial Engineering National Conference.

Maran, L., & Lowe, A. (2022). Competing logics in a hybrid organization: ICT service provision in the Italian health care sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(3), 770–800. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2019-4334

Potage, J. (2017). Managing procurement value creation with a maturity model. Logistique & Management, 25(4), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/12507970.2017.1381050

Putri, S. M., Pratami, D., Tripiawan, W., & Rahmanto, G. (2019). Assessing of project management process knowledge area: Procurement based on project management maturity model pmmm) (case study of pqr company). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 505(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012004

Ruiters, C., & Matji, M. P. (2016). Public–private partnership conceptual framework and models for the funding and financing of water services infrastructure in municipalities from selected provinces in South Africa. Water SA, 42(2), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.4314/WSA.V42I2.13

Shakya, Dr. R. K. (2015). Good governance in public procurement: An evaluation of the role of an e-procurement system, Ph.D. Thesis, Capella University

Silveira, P. B. da. (2018). Hybrid governance structure between public company and private partners: the case of Infraero in the Brazilian airline sector. Revista Direito GV, 14(2), 537–556. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172201822

Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: Institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/PADM.12105

Staples, W. (2010). Public value in public sector infrastructure procurement. Ph.D. Thesis. RMIT University.

Suardi, I. (2024). The Effect Of Maturity Of Procurement Unit Against Corruption Cases In Indonesian Government. Advanced International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance, 6(20), 01–12. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBAF.620001

Vakkuri, J., Johanson, J.-E., Feng, N. C., & Giordano, F. (2021). Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations – past, present and future. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 33(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2021-0033

Downloads

Published

2025-06-04

How to Cite

Sutisna, N., Rahman, T. K. A., & Bin Mansor, S. (2025). Contextualizing Procurement Maturity: Lessons from Government Procurement for Enhancing Regional-Owned Enterprise (BUMD) Performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach Research and Science, 3(02), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.59653/ijmars.v3i02.1568